Study number,Author,Year,Journal,Title,Location,Variable,Metric,Metric 2,Units,Type of insect,common species name,Order,Family,Feeding guild,IPM con,IPM scale con,IPM e,IPM scale e,IPM diff e,IPM o,IPM scale o,IPM diff o,Source,Nc,Ne,No,Xc,Xe,Xo,Dev_c,Dev_e,Dev_o
1,Pekár,1999,Journal of Applied Entomology,"Side-effect of integrated pest management and conventional spraying on the composition of epigeic spiders and harvestmen in an apple orchard (Araneae, Opiliones)",Czech Republic,Beneficial insect performance,Abundance,All years IPM-C,,Araneae,Various,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Fig 2,4,4,,1.667130919,1.292130919,,0.617772414,0.394640408,
1,Pekár,1999,Journal of Applied Entomology,"Side-effect of integrated pest management and conventional spraying on the composition of epigeic spiders and harvestmen in an apple orchard (Araneae, Opiliones)",Czech Republic,Beneficial insect performance,Abundance,All years IPM-G,,Araneae,Various,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Fig 2,4,4,,1.667130919,1.367339833,,0.617772414,0.59136341,
1,Pekár,1999,Journal of Applied Entomology,"Side-effect of integrated pest management and conventional spraying on the composition of epigeic spiders and harvestmen in an apple orchard (Araneae, Opiliones)",Czech Republic,Beneficial insect performance,Diversity,All years IPM-C,,Araneae,Various,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 3,4,4,,2.26,2.3525,,0.554316396,0.168597153,
1,Pekár,1999,Journal of Applied Entomology,"Side-effect of integrated pest management and conventional spraying on the composition of epigeic spiders and harvestmen in an apple orchard (Araneae, Opiliones)",Czech Republic,Beneficial insect performance,Diversity,All years IPM-G,,Araneae,Various,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 3,4,4,,2.26,2.43,,0.554316396,0.069761498,
2,Biggs,2000,Plant Disease,Assessment of an alternative IPM program for the production of apples for processing,USA,Beneficial insect performance,natural enemy abundance,,number per terminal,Various,Various,Various,Various,predator,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 2,2,2,,0.64,1.945,,0.650538239,2.057680733,
2,Biggs,2000,Plant Disease,Assessment of an alternative IPM program for the production of apples for processing,USA,pest pressure,pest abundance,,colonies per tree,Aphid,rosy apple aphid,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 2,2,2,,0.25,0.8,,0.353553391,0.424264069,
2,Biggs,2000,Plant Disease,Assessment of an alternative IPM program for the production of apples for processing,USA,pest pressure,pest abundance,,number per most infested leaf/terminal,Aphid,spirea aphid,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 2,4,4,,68.025,8.05,,77.13150567,6.553116307,
2,Biggs,2000,Plant Disease,Assessment of an alternative IPM program for the production of apples for processing,USA,pest pressure,pest abundance,,number per 25 leaves,Leafhopper,white apple leafhopper,Hemiptera,Cicadellidae,sucker,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 2,4,4,,6.125,2.675,,2.412985702,1.956825661,
2,Biggs,2000,Plant Disease,Assessment of an alternative IPM program for the production of apples for processing,USA,pest pressure,pest abundance,,number per leaf,Mite,european red mite,Trombidiformes,Tetranychidae,sucker,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 2,4,4,,3.5,0.575,,2.736177382,0.36855574,
2,Biggs,2000,Plant Disease,Assessment of an alternative IPM program for the production of apples for processing,USA,pest pressure,pest abundance,,number of mines per 5 min,Lepidoptera,spotted tentiform leafminer,Lepidoptera,Gracillariidae,Miner/borer,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 2,2,2,,4.25,1.1,,4.87903679,0.848528137,
2,Biggs,2000,Plant Disease,Assessment of an alternative IPM program for the production of apples for processing,USA,pest pressure,pest abundance,,g 100g-1 tissue consumed,Coleoptera,japanese beetle,Coleoptera,Scarabaeidae,chewer,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 2,3,3,,1.8,1.966666667,,1.652271164,0.665832812,
2,Biggs,2000,Plant Disease,Assessment of an alternative IPM program for the production of apples for processing,USA,pest pressure,plant damage,,% injured fruit,,,,,,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 3,3,3,,15.1,34.13333333,,9.37869927,22.40208324,
2,Biggs,2000,Plant Disease,Assessment of an alternative IPM program for the production of apples for processing,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,,%,,apple scab,,,,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 4,3,3,,0.666666667,1.2,,0.986576572,1.824828759,
2,Biggs,2000,Plant Disease,Assessment of an alternative IPM program for the production of apples for processing,USA,Disease incidence,severity,,number of lesions per infected fruit,,apple scab,,,,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 4,2,2,,0.5,1.55,,0.282842712,1.060660172,
2,Biggs,2000,Plant Disease,Assessment of an alternative IPM program for the production of apples for processing,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,,%,,flyspeck,,,,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 4,3,3,,12.06666667,84.4,,7.593637688,3.5,
2,Biggs,2000,Plant Disease,Assessment of an alternative IPM program for the production of apples for processing,USA,Disease incidence,severity,,scale,,flyspeck,,,,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 4,3,3,,0.866666667,1.7,,0.251661148,0.458257569,
2,Biggs,2000,Plant Disease,Assessment of an alternative IPM program for the production of apples for processing,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,,%,,sooty blotch,,,,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 4,3,3,,2.9,41.4,,2.40208243,13.74481721,
2,Biggs,2000,Plant Disease,Assessment of an alternative IPM program for the production of apples for processing,USA,Disease incidence,severity,,scale,,sooty blotch,,,,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 4,3,3,,0.533333333,1.333333333,,0.305505046,0.152752523,
2,Biggs,2000,Plant Disease,Assessment of an alternative IPM program for the production of apples for processing,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,,%,,rots,,,,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 4,3,3,,10.13333333,17.56666667,,5.216640043,10.51015382,
2,Biggs,2000,Plant Disease,Assessment of an alternative IPM program for the production of apples for processing,USA,Disease incidence,severity,,scale,,rots,,,,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 4,3,3,,1,1.366666667,,0.1,0.152752523,
2,Biggs,2000,Plant Disease,Assessment of an alternative IPM program for the production of apples for processing,USA,Yield,apples produced,,kg ha-1,,,,,,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 6,3,3,,11146.33333,15477.66667,,5138.894855,10263.11577,
2,Biggs,2000,Plant Disease,Assessment of an alternative IPM program for the production of apples for processing,USA,Quality,soluble solids,,brix (%),,,,,,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 5,3,3,,14.36666667,14.76666667,,0.37859389,0.65064071,
3,Samu,1997,Biological Agriculture and Horticulture,"Spiders of the foliage and herbaceous layer of an IPM apple orchard in Kecskemet-Szarkas, Hungary",Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,Spider abundance,,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 2,24,24,,0.6401684,0.460658622,,0.400148356,0.343917264,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,pest pressure,Insect damage,2014 BMSB,proportion of fruit,,BMSB,Hemiptera,Pentatomidae,sucker,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 4,50,50,,0.02,0.02,,0.070710678,0.141421356,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,pest pressure,Insect damage,2014 IL,proportion of fruit,,IL,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 4,50,50,,0,0.04,,0,0.070710678,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,pest pressure,Insect damage,2014 LR,proportion of fruit,,LR,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 4,50,50,,0,0.05,,0,0.141421356,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,pest pressure,Insect damage,2014 PC,proportion of fruit,,PC,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 4,50,50,,0.11,0.06,,0.282842712,0.282842712,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,pest pressure,Insect damage,2014 TPB,proportion of fruit,,TPB,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 4,50,50,,0.07,0.21,,0.141421356,0.636396103,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,pest pressure,Insect damage,2014 SJS,proportion of fruit,,SJS,Hemiptera,Diaspididae,sucker,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 4,50,50,,0.4,0.43,,0.494974747,0.424264069,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,pest pressure,Insect damage,2015 BMSB,proportion of fruit,,BMSB,Hemiptera,Pentatomidae,sucker,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 4,50,50,,0.21,0.22,,0.141421356,0.282842712,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,pest pressure,Insect damage,2015 IL,proportion of fruit,,IL,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 4,50,50,,0.03,0.08,,0.070710678,0.141421356,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,pest pressure,Insect damage,2015 LR,proportion of fruit,,LR,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 4,50,50,,0.02,0,,0.070710678,0,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,pest pressure,Insect damage,2015 PC,proportion of fruit,,PC,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 4,50,50,,0.01,0,,0,0,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,pest pressure,Insect damage,2015 TPB,proportion of fruit,,TPB,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 4,50,50,,0.01,0,,0.070710678,0,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,pest pressure,Insect damage,2015 SJS,proportion of fruit,,SJS,Hemiptera,Diaspididae,sucker,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 4,50,50,,0,0.03,,0,0.070710678,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,2014  SB,proportion of fruit,,SB,,,,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 5,50,50,,0.06,0.01,,0.070710678,0.070710678,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,2014 SBFS,proportion of fruit,,SBFS,,,,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 5,50,50,,0.03,0.04,,0.141421356,0.141421356,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,2014 FRD,proportion of fruit,,FRD,,,,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 5,50,50,,0,0.01,,0,0.070710678,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,2015 SB,proportion of fruit,,SB,,,,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 5,50,50,,0.05,0.01,,0.141421356,0.070710678,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,2015 SBFS,proportion of fruit,,SBFS,,,,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 5,50,50,,0.1,0.1,,0.212132034,0.212132034,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,2015 FRD,proportion of fruit,,FRD,,,,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 5,50,50,,0,0.01,,0,0.070710678,
4,Frank,2018,Insects,Evaluation of Fruit Bagging as a Pest Management Option for Direct Pests of Apple,USA,Quality,soluble solids,,brix (%),,,,,,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Fig 1,10,10,,9.924309884,10.44523598,,1.01373104,0.929253453,
5,Atlamaz,2007,Bulletin OEPP,The importance of forecasting and warning systems in implementation of integrated pest management in apple orchards in Turkey,Turkey,pest pressure,Insect damage,,% fruits infested,,Codling moth,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Text,9,9,,10.9,0.65,,7.2,0.44,
6,Garcia-Salazar,2007,Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems,"Hedgerow barriers and other reduced-risk controls for managing Oriental fruit moth, Grapholitha molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera : Tortricidae) in apples",USA,pest pressure,pest abundance,1996,moths per sampling period,,OFM,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,MP,2,2,,,,Fig 1,8,8,,0.418359058,0.081234768,,0.356138265,0.091906649,
6,Garcia-Salazar,2007,Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems,"Hedgerow barriers and other reduced-risk controls for managing Oriental fruit moth, Grapholitha molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera : Tortricidae) in apples",USA,pest pressure,pest abundance,1997,moths per sampling period,,OFM,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,MP,2,2,,,,Fig 1,8,8,,0.601137287,0.040617384,,0.666323206,0.057441656,
6,Garcia-Salazar,2007,Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems,"Hedgerow barriers and other reduced-risk controls for managing Oriental fruit moth, Grapholitha molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera : Tortricidae) in apples",USA,pest pressure,pest abundance,1999,moths per sampling period,,OFM,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,MP,2,2,,,,Fig 1,8,8,,0.828594639,0.199025183,,0.229766623,0.137859974,
7,Nicholas,2005,Biocontrol,Abundance and natural control of the woolly aphid Eriosoma lanigerum in an Australian apple orchard IPM program,Ausralia,pest pressure,pest abundance,1995/96 - AMD vs. FMD,infestation rating,,Woolly apple aphid,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 1A,16,16,,1.097034172,0.102675693,,0.721046733,0.052509357,
7,Nicholas,2005,Biocontrol,Abundance and natural control of the woolly aphid Eriosoma lanigerum in an Australian apple orchard IPM program,Ausralia,pest pressure,pest abundance,1996/97 - MD vs. AMD,infestation rating,,Woolly apple aphid,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 1B,16,16,,1.281983806,0.122596154,,0.910291273,0.093048348,
8,Bogya,2000,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Effect of pest management systems on ground-dwelling spider assemblages in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,IPM1 tree row,,Spiders,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,5,5,,27.6,35.4,,15.08,10.92,
8,Bogya,2000,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Effect of pest management systems on ground-dwelling spider assemblages in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,IPM2 tree row,,Spiders,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,5,5,,27.6,29.6,,15.08,5.9,
8,Bogya,2000,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Effect of pest management systems on ground-dwelling spider assemblages in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,IPM1 alley,,Spiders,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,5,5,,15.6,23,,9.61,7.84,
8,Bogya,2000,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Effect of pest management systems on ground-dwelling spider assemblages in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,IPM2 alley,,Spiders,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,5,5,,15.6,24.2,,9.61,2.59,
8,Bogya,2000,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Effect of pest management systems on ground-dwelling spider assemblages in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,richness,IPM1 tree row,,Spiders,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,5,5,,7,6.8,,1.87,1.3,
8,Bogya,2000,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Effect of pest management systems on ground-dwelling spider assemblages in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,richness,IPM2 tree row,,Spiders,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,5,5,,7,6,,1.87,1,
8,Bogya,2000,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Effect of pest management systems on ground-dwelling spider assemblages in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,richness,IPM1 alley,,Spiders,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,5,5,,5,6.2,,1.58,1.09,
8,Bogya,2000,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Effect of pest management systems on ground-dwelling spider assemblages in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,richness,IPM2 alley,,Spiders,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,5,5,,5,6.6,,1.58,1.14,
8,Bogya,2000,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Effect of pest management systems on ground-dwelling spider assemblages in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,Shannon diversity,IPM1 tree row,,Spiders,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,5,5,,1.94,1.65,,0.15,0.19,
8,Bogya,2000,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Effect of pest management systems on ground-dwelling spider assemblages in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,Shannon diversity,IPM2 tree row,,Spiders,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,5,5,,1.94,1.63,,0.15,0.35,
8,Bogya,2000,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Effect of pest management systems on ground-dwelling spider assemblages in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,Shannon diversity,IPM1 alley,,Spiders,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,5,5,,1.39,1.67,,0.39,0.11,
8,Bogya,2000,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Effect of pest management systems on ground-dwelling spider assemblages in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,Shannon diversity,IPM2 alley,,Spiders,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,5,5,,1.39,1.69,,0.39,0.11,
9,Funayama,2015,Experimental and Applied Acarology,"Management of apple orchards to conserve generalist phytoseiid mites suppresses two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)",Japan,pest pressure,pest abundance,tree 2012,number of adult females,Mite,Tetranychus urticae,Trombidiformes,Tetranychidae,sucker,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 3,12,12,,891.67,8.5,,110.7473286,8.833459119,
9,Funayama,2015,Experimental and Applied Acarology,"Management of apple orchards to conserve generalist phytoseiid mites suppresses two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)",Japan,pest pressure,pest abundance,tree 2013,number of adult females,Mite,Tetranychus urticae,Trombidiformes,Tetranychidae,sucker,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 3,12,12,,1020.08,24.08,,145.3537038,20.43819953,
9,Funayama,2015,Experimental and Applied Acarology,"Management of apple orchards to conserve generalist phytoseiid mites suppresses two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)",Japan,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,tree 2012,number of adult females,Mite,Typhlodromus vulgaris,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 3,12,12,,9.67,18,,8.348484892,9.249151312,
9,Funayama,2015,Experimental and Applied Acarology,"Management of apple orchards to conserve generalist phytoseiid mites suppresses two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)",Japan,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,tree 2013,number of adult females,Mite,Typhlodromus vulgaris,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 3,12,12,,34.33,33.17,,7.517100505,10.73871501,
9,Funayama,2015,Experimental and Applied Acarology,"Management of apple orchards to conserve generalist phytoseiid mites suppresses two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)",Japan,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,tree 2012,number of adult females,Mite,Neoseiulus womersleyi,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 3,12,12,,12.83,3.75,,6.235382907,3.775870761,
9,Funayama,2015,Experimental and Applied Acarology,"Management of apple orchards to conserve generalist phytoseiid mites suppresses two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)",Japan,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,tree 2013,number of adult females,Mite,Neoseiulus womersleyi,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 3,12,12,,7.25,3.42,,4.745819213,2.736640276,
9,Funayama,2015,Experimental and Applied Acarology,"Management of apple orchards to conserve generalist phytoseiid mites suppresses two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)",Japan,pest pressure,pest abundance,undergrowth 2012,number of adult females,Mite,Tetranychus urticae,Trombidiformes,Tetranychidae,sucker,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 4,12,12,,6.58,0.58,,6.962844246,0.969948452,
9,Funayama,2015,Experimental and Applied Acarology,"Management of apple orchards to conserve generalist phytoseiid mites suppresses two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)",Japan,pest pressure,pest abundance,undergrowth 2013,number of adult females,Mite,Tetranychus urticae,Trombidiformes,Tetranychidae,sucker,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 4,12,12,,4.17,0,,1.939896904,0,
9,Funayama,2015,Experimental and Applied Acarology,"Management of apple orchards to conserve generalist phytoseiid mites suppresses two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)",Japan,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,undergrowth 2012,number of adult females,Mite,Amblyseius tsugawai,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 4,12,12,,0.25,7.75,,0.45033321,9.214510296,
9,Funayama,2015,Experimental and Applied Acarology,"Management of apple orchards to conserve generalist phytoseiid mites suppresses two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)",Japan,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,undergrowth 2013,number of adult females,Mite,Amblyseius tsugawai,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 4,12,12,,0.17,6.58,,0.381051178,3.983716857,
9,Funayama,2015,Experimental and Applied Acarology,"Management of apple orchards to conserve generalist phytoseiid mites suppresses two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)",Japan,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,undergrowth 2012,number of adult females,Mite,Neoseiulus womersleyi,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 4,12,12,,0.08,2.25,,0.277128129,1.732050808,
9,Funayama,2015,Experimental and Applied Acarology,"Management of apple orchards to conserve generalist phytoseiid mites suppresses two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)",Japan,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,undergrowth 2013,number of adult females,Mite,Neoseiulus womersleyi,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 4,12,12,,0,0,,0,0,
10,Van Driesche,1998,Environmental Entomology,Effect of Reduced Insecticide and Fungicide Use on Parasitism of Leafminers (Phyllonorycter spp.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Commercial Apple Orchards,USA,pest pressure,abundance,1993 - Pest gen.1,number of mines per leaf,Leafminer,Phyllonorycter larvae,Lepidoptera,Gracillariidae,Miner/borer,CP,2,CMP,3,1,,,,Table 1,10,10,,0.011,0.015,,0.022135944,0.031622777,
10,Van Driesche,1998,Environmental Entomology,Effect of Reduced Insecticide and Fungicide Use on Parasitism of Leafminers (Phyllonorycter spp.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Commercial Apple Orchards,USA,pest pressure,abundance,1993 - Pest gen.2,number of mines per leaf,Leafminer,Phyllonorycter larvae,Lepidoptera,Gracillariidae,Miner/borer,CP,2,CMP,3,1,,,,Table 1,12,12,,0.141,0.175,,0.197453792,0.304840942,
10,Van Driesche,1998,Environmental Entomology,Effect of Reduced Insecticide and Fungicide Use on Parasitism of Leafminers (Phyllonorycter spp.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Commercial Apple Orchards,USA,pest pressure,abundance,1993 - Pest gen. 3,number of mines per leaf,Leafminer,Phyllonorycter larvae,Lepidoptera,Gracillariidae,Miner/borer,CP,2,CMP,3,1,,,,Table 1,12,12,,0.69,0.581,,0.817527981,0.554256258,
10,Van Driesche,1998,Environmental Entomology,Effect of Reduced Insecticide and Fungicide Use on Parasitism of Leafminers (Phyllonorycter spp.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Commercial Apple Orchards,USA,pest pressure,abundance,1994 - Pest gen.1,number of mines per leaf,Leafminer,Phyllonorycter larvae,Lepidoptera,Gracillariidae,Miner/borer,CP,2,CMP,3,1,,,,Table 1,11,11,,0.001,0.005,,0.003316625,0.009949874,
10,Van Driesche,1998,Environmental Entomology,Effect of Reduced Insecticide and Fungicide Use on Parasitism of Leafminers (Phyllonorycter spp.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Commercial Apple Orchards,USA,pest pressure,abundance,1994 - Pest gen.2,number of mines per leaf,Leafminer,Phyllonorycter larvae,Lepidoptera,Gracillariidae,Miner/borer,CP,2,CMP,3,1,,,,Table 1,11,11,,0.117,0.09,,0.179097739,0.122715117,
10,Van Driesche,1998,Environmental Entomology,Effect of Reduced Insecticide and Fungicide Use on Parasitism of Leafminers (Phyllonorycter spp.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Commercial Apple Orchards,USA,pest pressure,abundance,1994 - Pest gen. 3,number of mines per leaf,Leafminer,Phyllonorycter larvae,Lepidoptera,Gracillariidae,Miner/borer,CP,2,CMP,3,1,,,,Table 1,11,11,,0.543,0.34,,0.742923953,1.127652429,
10,Van Driesche,1998,Environmental Entomology,Effect of Reduced Insecticide and Fungicide Use on Parasitism of Leafminers (Phyllonorycter spp.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Commercial Apple Orchards,USA,Beneficial insect performance,parasitism,1993 - Pest gen.1 - Trap blocks,% parasitism,Leafminer,Phyllonorycter spp.,Hymenoptera,Various,parasitoid,CP,2,CMP,3,1,,,,Table 2,6,6,,21.4,27.5,,18.1262241,11.02270384,
10,Van Driesche,1998,Environmental Entomology,Effect of Reduced Insecticide and Fungicide Use on Parasitism of Leafminers (Phyllonorycter spp.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Commercial Apple Orchards,USA,Beneficial insect performance,parasitism,1993 - Pest gen.2 - Trap blocks,% parasitism,Leafminer,Phyllonorycter spp.,Hymenoptera,Various,parasitoid,CP,2,CMP,3,1,,,,Table 2,6,6,,36.5,55,,14.94188743,13.71714256,
10,Van Driesche,1998,Environmental Entomology,Effect of Reduced Insecticide and Fungicide Use on Parasitism of Leafminers (Phyllonorycter spp.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Commercial Apple Orchards,USA,Beneficial insect performance,parasitism,1993 - Pest gen. 3 - Trap blocks,% parasitism,Leafminer,Phyllonorycter spp.,Hymenoptera,Various,parasitoid,CP,2,CMP,3,1,,,,Table 2,6,6,,16.5,19,,16.1666323,13.71714256,
10,Van Driesche,1998,Environmental Entomology,Effect of Reduced Insecticide and Fungicide Use on Parasitism of Leafminers (Phyllonorycter spp.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Commercial Apple Orchards,USA,Beneficial insect performance,parasitism,1994 - Pest gen.1 - Trap blocks,% parasitism,Leafminer,Phyllonorycter spp.,Hymenoptera,Various,parasitoid,CP,2,CMP,3,1,,,,Table 2,6,6,,14.2,19.9,,15.67673435,10.77775487,
10,Van Driesche,1998,Environmental Entomology,Effect of Reduced Insecticide and Fungicide Use on Parasitism of Leafminers (Phyllonorycter spp.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Commercial Apple Orchards,USA,Beneficial insect performance,parasitism,1994 - Pest gen.2 - Trap blocks,% parasitism,Leafminer,Phyllonorycter spp.,Hymenoptera,Various,parasitoid,CP,2,CMP,3,1,,,,Table 2,6,6,,19.8,36,,10.53280589,13.71714256,
10,Van Driesche,1998,Environmental Entomology,Effect of Reduced Insecticide and Fungicide Use on Parasitism of Leafminers (Phyllonorycter spp.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Commercial Apple Orchards,USA,Beneficial insect performance,parasitism,1994 - Pest gen. 3 - Trap blocks,% parasitism,Leafminer,Phyllonorycter spp.,Hymenoptera,Various,parasitoid,CP,2,CMP,3,1,,,,Table 2,6,6,,23.9,26.3,,14.69693846,11.75755077,
10,Van Driesche,1998,Environmental Entomology,Effect of Reduced Insecticide and Fungicide Use on Parasitism of Leafminers (Phyllonorycter spp.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Commercial Apple Orchards,USA,Beneficial insect performance,parasitism,1993 - Pest gen.1 - Border spray blocks,% parasitism,Leafminer,Phyllonorycter spp.,Hymenoptera,Various,parasitoid,CP,2,CMP,3,1,,,,Table 2,6,6,,28.1,20.9,,31.59841768,22.53530563,
10,Van Driesche,1998,Environmental Entomology,Effect of Reduced Insecticide and Fungicide Use on Parasitism of Leafminers (Phyllonorycter spp.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Commercial Apple Orchards,USA,Beneficial insect performance,parasitism,1993 - Pest gen.2 - Border spray blocks,% parasitism,Leafminer,Phyllonorycter spp.,Hymenoptera,Various,parasitoid,CP,2,CMP,3,1,,,,Table 2,6,6,,44.1,37.7,,22.53530563,16.90147923,
10,Van Driesche,1998,Environmental Entomology,Effect of Reduced Insecticide and Fungicide Use on Parasitism of Leafminers (Phyllonorycter spp.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Commercial Apple Orchards,USA,Beneficial insect performance,parasitism,1993 - Pest gen. 3 - Border spray blocks,% parasitism,Leafminer,Phyllonorycter spp.,Hymenoptera,Various,parasitoid,CP,2,CMP,3,1,,,,Table 2,6,6,,12.3,15.2,,7.593418203,15.18683641,
10,Van Driesche,1998,Environmental Entomology,Effect of Reduced Insecticide and Fungicide Use on Parasitism of Leafminers (Phyllonorycter spp.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Commercial Apple Orchards,USA,Beneficial insect performance,parasitism,1994 - Pest gen.1 - Border spray blocks,% parasitism,Leafminer,Phyllonorycter spp.,Hymenoptera,Various,parasitoid,CP,2,CMP,3,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,20.6,26,,14.53444185,23.25510697,
10,Van Driesche,1998,Environmental Entomology,Effect of Reduced Insecticide and Fungicide Use on Parasitism of Leafminers (Phyllonorycter spp.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Commercial Apple Orchards,USA,Beneficial insect performance,parasitism,1994 - Pest gen.2 - Border spray blocks,% parasitism,Leafminer,Phyllonorycter spp.,Hymenoptera,Various,parasitoid,CP,2,CMP,3,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,23.4,36.4,,11.18033989,17.21772343,
10,Van Driesche,1998,Environmental Entomology,Effect of Reduced Insecticide and Fungicide Use on Parasitism of Leafminers (Phyllonorycter spp.) (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Commercial Apple Orchards,USA,Beneficial insect performance,parasitism,1994 - Pest gen. 3 - Border spray blocks,% parasitism,Leafminer,Phyllonorycter spp.,Hymenoptera,Various,parasitoid,CP,2,CMP,3,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,19.8,30.2,,10.73312629,22.13707298,
11,Suckling,1999,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Ecological impact of three pest management systems in New Zealand apple orchards,New Zealand,pest pressure,plant damage,leafroller damage - CFP vs BFP,% fruit damaged,Leafroller,,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 2,3,3,,0.466666667,3.733333333,,0.635085296,1.686218649,
11,Suckling,1999,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Ecological impact of three pest management systems in New Zealand apple orchards,New Zealand,pest pressure,plant damage,leafroller damage - CFP vs IFP,% fruit damaged,Leafroller,,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,3,3,,0.466666667,0.333333333,,0.635085296,0.251661148,
11,Suckling,1999,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Ecological impact of three pest management systems in New Zealand apple orchards,New Zealand,pest pressure,abundance,,,Mite,Panonychus ulmi,Trombidiformes,Tetranychidae,sucker,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 4,3,3,,0.14,0.713333333,,0.207846097,0.970790056,
11,Suckling,1999,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Ecological impact of three pest management systems in New Zealand apple orchards,New Zealand,pest pressure,abundance,,,Mite,Panonychus ulmi,Trombidiformes,Tetranychidae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 4,3,3,,0.14,0.103333333,,0.207846097,0.097125349,
11,Suckling,1999,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Ecological impact of three pest management systems in New Zealand apple orchards,New Zealand,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,,,Predatory mites,,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 4,3,3,,0.153333333,0.193333333,,0.170391706,0.173877351,
11,Suckling,1999,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Ecological impact of three pest management systems in New Zealand apple orchards,New Zealand,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,,,Predatory mites,,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 4,3,3,,0.153333333,0.22,,0.170391706,0.226053091,
11,Suckling,1999,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Ecological impact of three pest management systems in New Zealand apple orchards,New Zealand,pest pressure,abundance,,WAA colonies per min,Aphid,Woolly apple aphid,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 5,3,3,,12.36,44.13666667,,21.33890344,76.09215487,
11,Suckling,1999,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Ecological impact of three pest management systems in New Zealand apple orchards,New Zealand,pest pressure,abundance,,WAA colonies per min,Aphid,Woolly apple aphid,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 5,3,3,,12.36,49.33666667,,21.33890344,84.57994581,
11,Suckling,1999,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Ecological impact of three pest management systems in New Zealand apple orchards,New Zealand,Beneficial insect performance,,,% colonies parasitised,Aphid,Woolly apple aphid,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 5,3,3,,12,27.33333333,,18.24828759,29.14332399,
11,Suckling,1999,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Ecological impact of three pest management systems in New Zealand apple orchards,New Zealand,Beneficial insect performance,,,% colonies parasitised,Aphid,Woolly apple aphid,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 5,3,3,,12,32.33333333,,18.24828759,31.08590249,
11,Suckling,1999,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Ecological impact of three pest management systems in New Zealand apple orchards,New Zealand,pest pressure,shoot infestation,,%,Midge,Dasineura mali,Diptera,Cecidomyiidae,chewer,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 6,3,3,,22,27.33333333,,28.27985148,27.73685875,
11,Suckling,1999,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Ecological impact of three pest management systems in New Zealand apple orchards,New Zealand,pest pressure,shoot infestation,,%,Midge,Dasineura mali,Diptera,Cecidomyiidae,chewer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 6,3,3,,22,31.16666667,,28.27985148,24.32248617,
11,Suckling,1999,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Ecological impact of three pest management systems in New Zealand apple orchards,New Zealand,Beneficial insect performance,Shannon diversity,,,Predators and spiders,,Various,Various,predator,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Text,20,20,,0.02,0.41,,0.04472136,0.178885438,
11,Suckling,1999,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Ecological impact of three pest management systems in New Zealand apple orchards,New Zealand,Beneficial insect performance,Shannon diversity,,,Predators and spiders,,Various,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Text,20,20,,0.02,0.22,,0.04472136,0.178885438,
12,Reganold,2001,Nature,Sustainability of three apple production systems,USA,Yield,,,Mg ha-1,,,,,,none,0,CP,2,2,CMBP,4,4,Fig 1,5,5,,48.78281623,46.58711217,45.34606205,25.61249517,30.01206366,32.60006916
13,Holb,2017,Crop Protection,On-farm and on-station evaluations of three orchard management approaches against apple scab and apple powdery mildew,Hungary,Disease incidence,incidence,IPM1 - on-station,% (year + cultivar),,apple scab,,,,none,0,CMP,3,3,,,,Table 4,6,6,,4.8,6.2,,1.671725655,2.216904749,
13,Holb,2017,Crop Protection,On-farm and on-station evaluations of three orchard management approaches against apple scab and apple powdery mildew,Hungary,Disease incidence,incidence,IPM2 - on-station,% (year + cultivar),,apple scab,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 4,6,6,,4.8,10.4,,1.671725655,3.181613846,
13,Holb,2017,Crop Protection,On-farm and on-station evaluations of three orchard management approaches against apple scab and apple powdery mildew,Hungary,Disease incidence,incidence,IPM1 - on-farm,% (year + cultivar),,apple scab,,,,none,0,CMP,3,3,,,,Table 5,6,6,,5.1,6.7,,1.816223187,2.375499947,
13,Holb,2017,Crop Protection,On-farm and on-station evaluations of three orchard management approaches against apple scab and apple powdery mildew,Hungary,Disease incidence,incidence,IPM2 - on-farm,% (year + cultivar),,apple scab,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 5,6,6,,5.1,10.9,,1.816223187,3.362984785,
13,Holb,2017,Crop Protection,On-farm and on-station evaluations of three orchard management approaches against apple scab and apple powdery mildew,Hungary,Disease incidence,incidence,IPM1 - on-station,% (year + cultivar),,powdery mildew,,,,none,0,CMP,3,3,,,,Table 6,6,6,,6.3,8.3,,2.192487172,3.133953839,
13,Holb,2017,Crop Protection,On-farm and on-station evaluations of three orchard management approaches against apple scab and apple powdery mildew,Hungary,Disease incidence,incidence,IPM2 - on-station,% (year + cultivar),,powdery mildew,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 6,6,6,,6.3,11.9,,2.192487172,4.579701591,
13,Holb,2017,Crop Protection,On-farm and on-station evaluations of three orchard management approaches against apple scab and apple powdery mildew,Hungary,Disease incidence,incidence,IPM1 - on-farm,% (year + cultivar),,powdery mildew,,,,none,0,CMP,3,3,,,,Table 7,6,6,,6.7,8.6,,2.253589729,3.269046752,
13,Holb,2017,Crop Protection,On-farm and on-station evaluations of three orchard management approaches against apple scab and apple powdery mildew,Hungary,Disease incidence,incidence,IPM2 - on-farm,% (year + cultivar),,powdery mildew,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 7,6,6,,6.7,12.4,,2.253589729,4.852112942,
13,Holb,2017,Crop Protection,On-farm and on-station evaluations of three orchard management approaches against apple scab and apple powdery mildew,Hungary,Yield,,IPM1 - on-station,t ha-1 (year + all grades),,,,,,none,0,CMP,3,3,,,,Table 8,6,6,,29.5,29.3,,6.290866395,6.438762821,
13,Holb,2017,Crop Protection,On-farm and on-station evaluations of three orchard management approaches against apple scab and apple powdery mildew,Hungary,Yield,,IPM2 - on-station,t ha-1 (year + all grades),,,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 8,6,6,,29.5,27.6,,6.290866395,1.915637405,
13,Holb,2017,Crop Protection,On-farm and on-station evaluations of three orchard management approaches against apple scab and apple powdery mildew,Hungary,Yield,,IPM1 - on-farm,,,,,,,none,0,CMP,3,3,,,,Table 9,6,6,,26.7,27.5,,5.894884788,6.445282513,
13,Holb,2017,Crop Protection,On-farm and on-station evaluations of three orchard management approaches against apple scab and apple powdery mildew,Hungary,Yield,,IPM2 - on-farm,,,,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 9,6,6,,26.7,25.6,,5.894884788,2.181436835,
14,Cooley,1997,Plant Disease,Summer pruning as a method for reducing flyspeck disease on apple fruit,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,without fungicide,% fruit with colonies,,flyspeck,,,,P,1,CP,2,1,,,,Table 1,2,2,,41.1,22.35,,32.66833329,18.31406563,
14,Cooley,1997,Plant Disease,Summer pruning as a method for reducing flyspeck disease on apple fruit,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,with fungicide,%,,flyspeck,,,,none,0,C,1,1,,,,Table 3,2,2,,6.65,4.2,,1.202081528,1.555634919,
15,Pinero,2011,Journal of Economic Entomology,Effectiveness of Odor-Baited Trap Trees for Plum Curculio (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Monitoring in Commercial Apple Orchards in the Northeast,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,2004-harvest sampling - IPM1 (heat-unit accumulation),% infested fruit,,,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,24,24,,1.18,1.61,,1.61666323,1.61666323,
15,Pinero,2011,Journal of Economic Entomology,Effectiveness of Odor-Baited Trap Trees for Plum Curculio (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Monitoring in Commercial Apple Orchards in the Northeast,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,2005-harvest sampling - IPM1 (heat-unit accumulation),% infested fruit,,,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,21,21,,0.71,0.7,,0.733212111,0.733212111,
15,Pinero,2011,Journal of Economic Entomology,Effectiveness of Odor-Baited Trap Trees for Plum Curculio (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Monitoring in Commercial Apple Orchards in the Northeast,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,2004-harvest sampling - IPM2 (trap tree),% infested fruit,,,,,,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 2,24,24,,1.18,2.68,,1.61666323,4.311101947,
15,Pinero,2011,Journal of Economic Entomology,Effectiveness of Odor-Baited Trap Trees for Plum Curculio (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Monitoring in Commercial Apple Orchards in the Northeast,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,2005-harvest sampling - IPM2 (trap tree),% infested fruit,,,,,,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 2,21,21,,0.71,1.56,,0.733212111,2.520416632,
15,Pinero,2011,Journal of Economic Entomology,Effectiveness of Odor-Baited Trap Trees for Plum Curculio (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Monitoring in Commercial Apple Orchards in the Northeast,USA,pest pressure,incidence,2004 - IPM1 (heat-unit accumulation),% infested fruit,,tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,24,24,,3.16,6.89,,2.596459127,5.780795793,
15,Pinero,2011,Journal of Economic Entomology,Effectiveness of Odor-Baited Trap Trees for Plum Curculio (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Monitoring in Commercial Apple Orchards in the Northeast,USA,pest pressure,incidence,2005 - IPM1 (heat-unit accumulation),% infested fruit,,tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,21,21,,0.96,1.46,,0.962340896,1.374772708,
15,Pinero,2011,Journal of Economic Entomology,Effectiveness of Odor-Baited Trap Trees for Plum Curculio (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Monitoring in Commercial Apple Orchards in the Northeast,USA,pest pressure,incidence,2004 - IPM2 (trap tree),% infested fruit,,tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 3,24,24,,3.16,6.51,,2.596459127,6.6626121,
15,Pinero,2011,Journal of Economic Entomology,Effectiveness of Odor-Baited Trap Trees for Plum Curculio (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Monitoring in Commercial Apple Orchards in the Northeast,USA,pest pressure,incidence,2005 - IPM2 (trap tree),% infested fruit,,tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 3,21,21,,0.96,1.22,,0.962340896,1.099818167,
16,Fountain,2015,Biological Control,Non-target consequences of insecticides used in apple and pear orchards on Forficula auricularia L. (Dermaptera: Forficulidae),UK,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,"mean of male, female and nymph",number per tree,earwig,,Dermaptera,,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 4,3,3,,1.091333333,2.374666667,,0.892269765,2.052862717,
17,Tamosiunas,2014,Zemdirbyste-Agriculture,Variety-specific population density and infestation levels of apple sawfly (Hoplocampa testudinea Klug) in two differently managed apple orchards in Lithuania,Lithuania,pest pressure,pest abundance,cv Lodel 2011,number per trap,sawflies,,Hymenoptera,,chewer,none,0,,,,CP,2,2,"Figs 1,4",4,,4,4.773291925,,4.750755287,3.422360248,,3.577039275
17,Tamosiunas,2014,Zemdirbyste-Agriculture,Variety-specific population density and infestation levels of apple sawfly (Hoplocampa testudinea Klug) in two differently managed apple orchards in Lithuania,Lithuania,pest pressure,pest abundance,cv Lodel 2012,number per trap,sawflies,,Hymenoptera,,chewer,none,0,,,,CP,2,2,"Figs 1,4",4,,4,3.377329193,,22.74773414,1.98136646,,13.63746224
17,Tamosiunas,2014,Zemdirbyste-Agriculture,Variety-specific population density and infestation levels of apple sawfly (Hoplocampa testudinea Klug) in two differently managed apple orchards in Lithuania,Lithuania,pest pressure,pest abundance,cv Lodel 2013,number per trap,sawflies,,Hymenoptera,,chewer,none,0,,,,CP,2,2,"Figs 1,4",4,,4,9.366459627,,10.22809668,2.881987578,,4.024169184
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,,mean of all years,cumulative mite-days,,ERM,Trombidiformes,Tetranychidae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 2A,3,3,,29.1422185,18.52472758,,20.16572372,14.3353283,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Beneficial insect performance,,mean of all years,cumulative mite-days,,Phytoseiid spp.,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 2B,3,3,,13.66181411,32.77342292,,10.14782599,29.42750506,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1996 cv Red Delicious,%,,Apple fruit scab,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1996 cv Rome-North,%,,Apple fruit scab,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1996 cv Rome-South,%,,Apple fruit scab,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1996 cv Jerseyman,%,,Apple fruit scab,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,1,0,,1.4,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1996 cv Empire,%,,Apple fruit scab,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1996 cv Cortland,%,,Apple fruit scab,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,12.3,0.8,,14.2,1,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1997 cv Red DeliciousA,%,,Apple fruit scab,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0.3,0,,0.6,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1997 cv Red DeliciousB,%,,Apple fruit scab,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0.5,,0,0.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1997 cv Jerseyman,%,,Apple fruit scab,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0.3,0.3,,0.6,0.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1997 cv Empire,%,,Apple fruit scab,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,1.3,0.8,,2.6,0.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1997 cv Cortland,%,,Apple fruit scab,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,1,0,,1.4,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1998 cv Red DeliciousA,%,,Apple fruit scab,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,3,4.5,,1.4,4.2,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1998 cv Red DeliciousB,%,,Apple fruit scab,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0.5,0.3,,0.6,0.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1998 cv Jerseyman,%,,Apple fruit scab,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,1,0.3,,1.2,0.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1998 cv Empire,%,,Apple fruit scab,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0.8,0,,1,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1998 cv Cortland,%,,Apple fruit scab,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,15.5,3.3,,9.6,1.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1996 cv Red Delicious,%,,Obliquebanded leafroller,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,5.5,5.5,,3.2,0.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1996 cv Rome-North,%,,Obliquebanded leafroller,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,9.5,0.8,,3.4,1.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1996 cv Rome-South,%,,Obliquebanded leafroller,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,1.3,1,,1.8,0.8,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1996 cv Jerseyman,%,,Obliquebanded leafroller,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0.5,1.8,,0.6,1,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1996 cv Empire,%,,Obliquebanded leafroller,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1996 cv Cortland,%,,Obliquebanded leafroller,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,1.8,6.3,,1,3,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1997 cv Red DeliciousA,%,,Obliquebanded leafroller,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,9.8,11.5,,2.2,2.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1997 cv Red DeliciousB,%,,Obliquebanded leafroller,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,2.3,3.3,,2,1.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1997 cv Jerseyman,%,,Obliquebanded leafroller,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,1,3,,1.2,1.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1997 cv Empire,%,,Obliquebanded leafroller,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0.8,2.5,,1,1.8,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1997 cv Cortland,%,,Obliquebanded leafroller,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,5.5,14.5,,2.6,6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1998 cv Red DeliciousA,%,,Obliquebanded leafroller,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,7.5,4.8,,3.4,1.2,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1998 cv Red DeliciousB,%,,Obliquebanded leafroller,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,10,3.8,,6,1.8,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1998 cv Jerseyman,%,,Obliquebanded leafroller,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,29.3,17.5,,4.4,6.2,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1998 cv Empire,%,,Obliquebanded leafroller,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,10.8,5.5,,1,2.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1998 cv Cortland,%,,Obliquebanded leafroller,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,14.8,17.5,,5.2,9.8,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1996 cv Red Delicious,%,,Tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,2.8,1,,2,1.2,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1996 cv Rome-North,%,,Tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0.5,1,,1,0.8,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1996 cv Rome-South,%,,Tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0.5,,0,0.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1996 cv Jerseyman,%,,Tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0.3,,0,0.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1996 cv Empire,%,,Tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1996 cv Cortland,%,,Tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1997 cv Red DeliciousA,%,,Tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0.5,0.3,,1,0.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1997 cv Red DeliciousB,%,,Tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1997 cv Jerseyman,%,,Tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0.3,,0,0.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1997 cv Empire,%,,Tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1997 cv Cortland,%,,Tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1998 cv Red DeliciousA,%,,Tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1998 cv Red DeliciousB,%,,Tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1998 cv Jerseyman,%,,Tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1998 cv Empire,%,,Tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,pest pressure,incidence,1998 cv Cortland,%,,Tarnished plant bug,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1996 cv Red Delicious,%,,Flyspeck,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,1.5,1.5,,1.4,1.4,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1996 cv Rome-North,%,,Flyspeck,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1996 cv Rome-South,%,,Flyspeck,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1996 cv Jerseyman,%,,Flyspeck,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1996 cv Empire,%,,Flyspeck,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,4.3,0,,3.4,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1996 cv Cortland,%,,Flyspeck,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,20.8,0.3,,2.2,0.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1997 cv Red DeliciousA,%,,Flyspeck,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0.5,,0,0.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1997 cv Red DeliciousB,%,,Flyspeck,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0.3,0.3,,0.6,0.6,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1997 cv Jerseyman,%,,Flyspeck,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1997 cv Empire,%,,Flyspeck,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,4.3,0,,3.4,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1997 cv Cortland,%,,Flyspeck,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,6,1,,2.2,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1998 cv Red DeliciousA,%,,Flyspeck,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1998 cv Red DeliciousB,%,,Flyspeck,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1998 cv Jerseyman,%,,Flyspeck,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1998 cv Empire,%,,Flyspeck,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
18,Agnello,2003,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Integrated apple pest management in, New York State using predatory mites and selective pesticides",USA,Disease incidence,incidence,1998 cv Cortland,%,,Flyspeck,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,4,4,,0,0,,0,0,
19,Sarvary,2007,Biological Control,Potential for conservation biological control of the obliquebanded leafroller (OBLR) Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris) in orchard systems managed with reduced-risk insecticides,USA,Beneficial insect performance,incidence,2003  sample period 1,% parasitism,,,Various,Various,parasitoid,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 1A,5,5,,18.91598916,8.834688347,,26.22331786,14.25204257,
19,Sarvary,2007,Biological Control,Potential for conservation biological control of the obliquebanded leafroller (OBLR) Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris) in orchard systems managed with reduced-risk insecticides,USA,Beneficial insect performance,incidence,2003  sample period 2,% parasitism,,,Various,Various,parasitoid,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 1A,5,5,,10.78590786,14.47154472,,14.94846625,12.88742553,
19,Sarvary,2007,Biological Control,Potential for conservation biological control of the obliquebanded leafroller (OBLR) Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris) in orchard systems managed with reduced-risk insecticides,USA,Beneficial insect performance,incidence,2003  sample period 3,% parasitism,,,Various,Various,parasitoid,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 1A,5,5,,17.61517615,21.30081301,,24.00620264,18.74831142,
19,Sarvary,2007,Biological Control,Potential for conservation biological control of the obliquebanded leafroller (OBLR) Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris) in orchard systems managed with reduced-risk insecticides,USA,Beneficial insect performance,incidence,2003  sample period 1,% predation,,,Various,Various,parasitoid,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 1D,5,5,,24.35804702,20.56057866,,9.324738268,9.336408665,
19,Sarvary,2007,Biological Control,Potential for conservation biological control of the obliquebanded leafroller (OBLR) Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris) in orchard systems managed with reduced-risk insecticides,USA,Beneficial insect performance,incidence,2003  sample period 2,% predation,,,Various,Various,parasitoid,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 1D,5,5,,32.4954792,26.41952984,,8.647112472,10.9585161,
19,Sarvary,2007,Biological Control,Potential for conservation biological control of the obliquebanded leafroller (OBLR) Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris) in orchard systems managed with reduced-risk insecticides,USA,Beneficial insect performance,incidence,2003  sample period 3,% predation,,,Various,Various,parasitoid,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 1D,5,5,,17.08860759,14.59312839,,4.674661856,4.416326384,
19,Sarvary,2007,Biological Control,Potential for conservation biological control of the obliquebanded leafroller (OBLR) Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris) in orchard systems managed with reduced-risk insecticides,USA,Beneficial insect performance,incidence,2004  sample period 1,% parasitism,,,Various,Various,parasitoid,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 2A,5,5,,5.625,10.625,,7.803765779,10.32978923,
19,Sarvary,2007,Biological Control,Potential for conservation biological control of the obliquebanded leafroller (OBLR) Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris) in orchard systems managed with reduced-risk insecticides,USA,Beneficial insect performance,incidence,2004  sample period 2,% parasitism,,,Various,Various,parasitoid,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 2A,5,5,,18.46590909,11.53409091,,18.48689367,9.932169226,
19,Sarvary,2007,Biological Control,Potential for conservation biological control of the obliquebanded leafroller (OBLR) Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris) in orchard systems managed with reduced-risk insecticides,USA,Beneficial insect performance,incidence,2004  sample period 3,% parasitism,,,Various,Various,parasitoid,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 2A,5,5,,7.102272727,11.53409091,,4.727600513,9.012192212,
19,Sarvary,2007,Biological Control,Potential for conservation biological control of the obliquebanded leafroller (OBLR) Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris) in orchard systems managed with reduced-risk insecticides,USA,Beneficial insect performance,incidence,2004  sample period 1,% predation,,,Various,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 2D,5,5,,36.19477006,27.43011722,,13.53015616,17.31164333,
19,Sarvary,2007,Biological Control,Potential for conservation biological control of the obliquebanded leafroller (OBLR) Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris) in orchard systems managed with reduced-risk insecticides,USA,Beneficial insect performance,incidence,2004  sample period 2,% predation,,,Various,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 2D,5,5,,35.54553652,32.19116321,,6.27825584,7.979896375,
19,Sarvary,2007,Biological Control,Potential for conservation biological control of the obliquebanded leafroller (OBLR) Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris) in orchard systems managed with reduced-risk insecticides,USA,Beneficial insect performance,incidence,2004  sample period 3,% predation,,,Various,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 2D,5,5,,31.65013526,35.7619477,,11.74102959,14.9698436,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,1992 row IPM1,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,22.4,74.6,,7.8,17.7,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,1993 row IPM1,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,143.8,218.8,,78.2,77.9,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,1994 row IPM1,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,100.2,298.6,,66.2,69.3,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,1992 alley IPM1,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,31.4,110.8,,11.5,27.6,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,1993 alley IPM1,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,115.6,306,,67,54.3,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,1994 alley IPM1,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,183.4,411.2,,102.8,89.3,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,1992 row IPM2,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,22.4,72,,7.8,10.8,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,1993 row IPM2,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,143.8,232.8,,78.2,56.1,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,1994 row IPM2,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,100.2,261.6,,66.2,50.7,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,1992 row IPM1,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,31.4,171.6,,11.5,55.5,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,1993 row IPM1,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,115.6,299.8,,67,58.5,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,1994 row IPM1,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,183.4,473.4,,102.8,108.7,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,species richness,1992 row IPM1,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,6.8,11,,2.3,1.9,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,species richness,1993 row IPM1,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,12.2,11.6,,2.8,1.1,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,species richness,1994 row IPM1,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,13.2,17.6,,4.3,2.1,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,species richness,1992 alley IPM1,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,5.4,7.8,,1.1,1.3,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,species richness,1993 alley IPM1,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,9.6,11,,1.7,1.6,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,species richness,1994 alley IPM1,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,11.2,13.2,,4,3,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,species richness,1992 row IPM2,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,6.8,9.4,,2.3,2.4,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,species richness,1993 row IPM2,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,12.2,13.6,,2.8,1.7,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,species richness,1994 row IPM2,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,13.2,18.4,,4.3,3,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,species richness,1992 row IPM1,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,5.4,9.4,,1.1,3.2,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,species richness,1993 row IPM1,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,9.6,12.6,,1.7,1.82,
20,Marko,2005,Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica,Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,species richness,1994 row IPM1,,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,5,5,,11.2,14,,4,1.6,
21,Mickaël,2015,Applied Soil Ecology,"Orchard management influences both functional and taxonomic ground beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) diversity in South-East France",France,Beneficial insect performance,species richness,Spring (N=15),number of species,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,MP,2,2,MBP,3,3,Fig 2A,15,15,15,9.188767551,9.563182527,14.55538222,4.685706872,5.178939175,8.323295102
21,Mickaël,2015,Applied Soil Ecology,"Orchard management influences both functional and taxonomic ground beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) diversity in South-East France",France,Beneficial insect performance,species richness,Summer (N = 15),number of species,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,MP,2,2,MBP,3,3,Fig 2B,15,15,15,4.461778471,9.734789392,10.70202808,2.342853436,6.72029012,6.596982044
21,Mickaël,2015,Applied Soil Ecology,"Orchard management influences both functional and taxonomic ground beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) diversity in South-East France",France,Beneficial insect performance,species richness,Fall (N = 15),number of species,Carabid beetles,,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,MP,2,2,MBP,3,3,Fig 2C,15,15,15,6.948356808,11.76838811,9.577464789,4.638525613,5.999159793,5.751771761
22,Dib,2016,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Effect of management strategies on arthropod communities in the colonies of rosy apple aphid, Dysaphis plantaginea Passerini (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in south-eastern France",France,pest pressure,pest abundance,2008,,aphid,rosy apple aphid,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,none,0,MP,2,2,MBP,3,3,Table 1,4,3,3,86.23,70.44,32.11,17.16,17.1646235,11.50081736
22,Dib,2016,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Effect of management strategies on arthropod communities in the colonies of rosy apple aphid, Dysaphis plantaginea Passerini (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in south-eastern France",France,pest pressure,pest abundance,2009,,aphid,rosy apple aphid,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,none,0,MP,2,2,MBP,3,3,Table 1,5,3,4,77.9,142.48,52.69,17.19536275,16.07343149,12.66
22,Dib,2016,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Effect of management strategies on arthropod communities in the colonies of rosy apple aphid, Dysaphis plantaginea Passerini (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in south-eastern France",France,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2008,,natural enemies,,,,,none,0,MP,2,2,MBP,3,3,Table 1,4,3,3,1.93,3.03,3.75,0.96,0.98726896,1.091192009
22,Dib,2016,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Effect of management strategies on arthropod communities in the colonies of rosy apple aphid, Dysaphis plantaginea Passerini (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in south-eastern France",France,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2009,,natural enemies,,,,,none,0,MP,2,2,MBP,3,3,Table 1,5,3,4,0.93,3.11,7.48,0.782623792,1.316358614,1.72
22,Dib,2016,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Effect of management strategies on arthropod communities in the colonies of rosy apple aphid, Dysaphis plantaginea Passerini (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in south-eastern France",France,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2008,,active natural enemies,,,,,none,0,MP,2,2,MBP,3,3,Table 1,4,3,3,0.29,0.85,1.35,0.16,0.329089653,0.277128129
22,Dib,2016,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Effect of management strategies on arthropod communities in the colonies of rosy apple aphid, Dysaphis plantaginea Passerini (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in south-eastern France",France,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2009,,active natural enemies,,,,,none,0,MP,2,2,MBP,3,3,Table 1,5,3,4,0.06,0.2,1.33,0.04472136,0.173205081,0.28
22,Dib,2016,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Effect of management strategies on arthropod communities in the colonies of rosy apple aphid, Dysaphis plantaginea Passerini (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in south-eastern France",France,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2008,,coccinellids,,Coleoptera,Coccinellidae,predator,none,0,MP,2,2,MBP,3,3,Table 1,4,3,3,0.06,0.03,0.99,0.04,0.034641016,0.571576766
22,Dib,2016,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Effect of management strategies on arthropod communities in the colonies of rosy apple aphid, Dysaphis plantaginea Passerini (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in south-eastern France",France,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2009,,coccinellids,,Coleoptera,Coccinellidae,predator,none,0,MP,2,2,MBP,3,3,Table 1,5,3,4,0.04,0.29,0.69,0.04472136,0.467653718,0.2
22,Dib,2016,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Effect of management strategies on arthropod communities in the colonies of rosy apple aphid, Dysaphis plantaginea Passerini (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in south-eastern France",France,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2008,,foriculids,,Dermaptera,Forficulidae,predator,none,0,MP,2,2,MBP,3,3,Table 1,4,3,3,0.07,0.31,0.37,0.08,0.190525589,0.138564065
22,Dib,2016,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Effect of management strategies on arthropod communities in the colonies of rosy apple aphid, Dysaphis plantaginea Passerini (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in south-eastern France",France,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2009,,foriculids,,Dermaptera,Forficulidae,predator,none,0,MP,2,2,MBP,3,3,Table 1,5,3,4,0,0,0.46,0,0,0.16
22,Dib,2016,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Effect of management strategies on arthropod communities in the colonies of rosy apple aphid, Dysaphis plantaginea Passerini (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in south-eastern France",France,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2008,,syrphids,,Diptera,Syrphidae,predator,none,0,MP,2,2,MBP,3,3,Table 1,4,3,3,0.08,0.32,0.21,0.1,0.225166605,0.103923048
22,Dib,2016,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Effect of management strategies on arthropod communities in the colonies of rosy apple aphid, Dysaphis plantaginea Passerini (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in south-eastern France",France,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2009,,syrphids,,Diptera,Syrphidae,predator,none,0,MP,2,2,MBP,3,3,Table 1,5,3,4,0,0.03,0.11,0,0.034641016,0.06
22,Dib,2016,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Effect of management strategies on arthropod communities in the colonies of rosy apple aphid, Dysaphis plantaginea Passerini (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in south-eastern France",France,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2008,,parasitoids,,Hymenoptera,Various,parasitoid,none,0,MP,2,2,MBP,3,3,Table 1,4,3,3,1.65,2.17,1.89,0.94,0.81406388,0.98726896
22,Dib,2016,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,"Effect of management strategies on arthropod communities in the colonies of rosy apple aphid, Dysaphis plantaginea Passerini (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in south-eastern France",France,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2009,,parasitoids,,Hymenoptera,Various,parasitoid,none,0,MP,2,2,MBP,3,3,Table 1,5,3,4,0.74,2.64,6.11,0.760263112,1.195115057,1.68
23,Givaudan,2016,Soil Biology and Biochemistry,Impact of apple orchard management strategies on earthworm (Allolobophora chlorotica) energy reserves,France,Beneficial insect performance,energy reserves,Lipids,mg/g fresh ew,earthworms,,Opisthopora,,soil-dweller,P,1,MP,2,1,BP,2,1,Fig 2A,4,4,4,9.3898,13.9667,15.2032,5.8529,8.3162,9.0602
23,Givaudan,2016,Soil Biology and Biochemistry,Impact of apple orchard management strategies on earthworm (Allolobophora chlorotica) energy reserves,France,Beneficial insect performance,energy reserves,Glycogen,mg/g fresh ew,earthworms,,Opisthopora,,soil-dweller,P,1,MP,2,1,BP,2,1,Fig 2B,4,4,4,14.7035,32.5151,46.1518,10.903,40.5127,41.1828
24,Pekar,1999,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Effect of IPM practices and conventional spraying on spider population dynamics in an apple orchard,Czech Republic,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,IPM-C Arboreal spiders,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 2,4,4,,313,303,,251.2223451,167.5470083,
24,Pekar,1999,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Effect of IPM practices and conventional spraying on spider population dynamics in an apple orchard,Czech Republic,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,IPM-G Arboreal spiders,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 2,4,4,,313,374.25,,251.2223451,231.0012626,
24,Pekar,1999,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Effect of IPM practices and conventional spraying on spider population dynamics in an apple orchard,Czech Republic,Beneficial insect performance,Shannon diversity,IPM-C,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 4,4,4,,0.9155,1.07725,,0.061495257,0.119315758,
24,Pekar,1999,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Effect of IPM practices and conventional spraying on spider population dynamics in an apple orchard,Czech Republic,Beneficial insect performance,Shannon diversity,IPM-G,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 4,4,4,,0.9155,0.9865,,0.061495257,0.072043968,
25,Thaczuk,2019,Fresenius Environmental Bulletin,THE OCCURRENCE OF ENTOMOPATHOGENIC FUNGI IN SOILS FROM APPLE ORCHARDS PROTECTED IN DIFFERENT FARMING SYSTEMS,Austria,Beneficial insect performance,Density of colony-forming units,Fallow - Austria ORG,CFU x103 g-1,Entomopathogenic fungi,,,,,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Table 2,3,,3,2.2,,4.8,1.802775638,,1.150362262
25,Thaczuk,2019,Fresenius Environmental Bulletin,THE OCCURRENCE OF ENTOMOPATHOGENIC FUNGI IN SOILS FROM APPLE ORCHARDS PROTECTED IN DIFFERENT FARMING SYSTEMS,Austria,Beneficial insect performance,Density of colony-forming units,Sward - Austria ORG,CFU x103 g-1,Entomopathogenic fungi,,,,,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Table 2,3,,3,4.5,,2.4,1.814754345,,0.585946528
25,Thaczuk,2019,Fresenius Environmental Bulletin,THE OCCURRENCE OF ENTOMOPATHOGENIC FUNGI IN SOILS FROM APPLE ORCHARDS PROTECTED IN DIFFERENT FARMING SYSTEMS,Poland,Beneficial insect performance,Density of colony-forming units,Fallow - Poland IPM,CFU x103 g-1,Entomopathogenic fungi,,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,3,3,,1,3.4,,0.435889894,4.292241062,
25,Thaczuk,2019,Fresenius Environmental Bulletin,THE OCCURRENCE OF ENTOMOPATHOGENIC FUNGI IN SOILS FROM APPLE ORCHARDS PROTECTED IN DIFFERENT FARMING SYSTEMS,Poland,Beneficial insect performance,Density of colony-forming units,Sward - Poland IPM,CFU x103 g-1,Entomopathogenic fungi,,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,3,3,,2.7,1.9,,1.761628035,1.5011107,
26,Szabo,2014,Experimental and Applied Acarology,Pest management systems affect composition but not abundance of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in apple orchards,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,,,Predatory mites,Phytoseiid spp.,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,P,1,1,Fig 2A,8,8,7,2.496206373,2.348254932,1.820940819,1.373439575,1.555849519,0.752774463
26,Szabo,2014,Experimental and Applied Acarology,Pest management systems affect composition but not abundance of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in apple orchards,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,richness,,,Predatory mites,Phytoseiid spp.,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,P,1,1,Fig 2B,8,8,7,1.371237458,2.115384615,3.277591973,0.520279237,0.638524518,1.106083324
26,Szabo,2014,Experimental and Applied Acarology,Pest management systems affect composition but not abundance of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in apple orchards,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,Renyi diversity alpha 0,,,Predatory mites,Phytoseiid spp.,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,P,1,1,Table 3,8,8,7,1.5,2.5,4.1,0.848528137,1.13137085,1.587450787
26,Szabo,2014,Experimental and Applied Acarology,Pest management systems affect composition but not abundance of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in apple orchards,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,Renyi diversity alpha 4,,,Predatory mites,Phytoseiid spp.,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,P,1,1,Table 3,8,8,7,1.01,1.3,1.9,0.282842712,0.282842712,0.529150262
27,Bogya,2000,International Journal of Pest Management,Effect of pest management systems on foliage- and grass-dwelling spider communities in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,Foliage-dwellers - Young,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,5,5,,9.8,26.8,,3.56,5.97,
27,Bogya,2000,International Journal of Pest Management,Effect of pest management systems on foliage- and grass-dwelling spider communities in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,richness,Foliage-dwellers - Young,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,5,5,,5,9.8,,2.12,1.79,
27,Bogya,2000,International Journal of Pest Management,Effect of pest management systems on foliage- and grass-dwelling spider communities in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,Foliage-dwellers - Old,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,5,5,,4.8,17.6,,4.26,7.5,
27,Bogya,2000,International Journal of Pest Management,Effect of pest management systems on foliage- and grass-dwelling spider communities in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,richness,Foliage-dwellers - Old,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 3,5,5,,3.8,10.2,,3.11,4.32,
27,Bogya,2000,International Journal of Pest Management,Effect of pest management systems on foliage- and grass-dwelling spider communities in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,Tree trunks - Young,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 6,5,5,,4.6,25.6,,1.67,16.83,
27,Bogya,2000,International Journal of Pest Management,Effect of pest management systems on foliage- and grass-dwelling spider communities in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,richness,Tree trunks - Young,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 6,5,5,,2.8,5.2,,0.45,1.09,
27,Bogya,2000,International Journal of Pest Management,Effect of pest management systems on foliage- and grass-dwelling spider communities in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,Tree trunks - Old,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 6,5,5,,2,3.8,,0.71,1.92,
27,Bogya,2000,International Journal of Pest Management,Effect of pest management systems on foliage- and grass-dwelling spider communities in an apple orchard in Hungary,Hungary,Beneficial insect performance,richness,Tree trunks - Old,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 6,5,5,,1.6,2.4,,0.55,0.89,
28,Mates,2012,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Parasitoid wasp diversity in apple orchards along a pest-management gradient,USA,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,All months - ABO,,parasitoids,,Hymenoptera,Various,parasitoid,none,0,CMP,3,3,CMP,3,3,Fig 1B,4,4,4,5.143890675,5.093247588,5.72266881,8.369045609,4.191715151,2.843913302
28,Mates,2012,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Parasitoid wasp diversity in apple orchards along a pest-management gradient,USA,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,All months - IPM-d,,parasitoids,,Hymenoptera,Various,parasitoid,none,0,P,1,1,CMP,3,3,Fig 1B,4,4,4,5.143890675,3.479903537,5.72266881,8.369045609,2.167055273,2.843913302
28,Mates,2012,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Parasitoid wasp diversity in apple orchards along a pest-management gradient,USA,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,All months - IPM-i,,parasitoids,,Hymenoptera,Various,parasitoid,none,0,CP,2,2,CMP,3,3,Fig 1B,4,4,4,5.143890675,0.897106109,5.72266881,8.369045609,0.720572967,2.843913302
29,Hardman,2000,Journal of Economic Entomology,Performance of a pyrethroid-resistant strain of the predator mite Typhlodromus pyri (Acari : Phytoseiidae) under different insecticide regimes,Canada,pest pressure,Mite days,1995 - DIPYR v ADV,,European red mite,Panonychus ulmi,Trombidiformes,Tetranychidae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 7,4,4,,594.6268657,214.9253731,,128.9552239,207.761194,
29,Hardman,2000,Journal of Economic Entomology,Performance of a pyrethroid-resistant strain of the predator mite Typhlodromus pyri (Acari : Phytoseiidae) under different insecticide regimes,Canada,Beneficial insect performance,Mite days,1995 - DIPYR v ADV,,Phytoseiid mite,Typhlodromus pyri,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 7,4,4,,0.600600601,100.3003003,,4.804804805,37.23723724,
29,Hardman,2000,Journal of Economic Entomology,Performance of a pyrethroid-resistant strain of the predator mite Typhlodromus pyri (Acari : Phytoseiidae) under different insecticide regimes,Canada,pest pressure,Mite days,1995 - DIPYR v ADV,,apple rust mite,Aculus schlechtendali,Trombidiformes,Eriophyidae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 7,4,4,,20.86438152,226.5275708,,41.72876304,256.3338301,
29,Hardman,2000,Journal of Economic Entomology,Performance of a pyrethroid-resistant strain of the predator mite Typhlodromus pyri (Acari : Phytoseiidae) under different insecticide regimes,Canada,Beneficial insect performance,Mite days,1995 - DIPYR v ADV,,stigmaeid predator mite,Zetzellia mali,Trombidiformes,Stigmaeidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 7,4,4,,0.090909091,1,,0.272727273,1,
29,Hardman,2000,Journal of Economic Entomology,Performance of a pyrethroid-resistant strain of the predator mite Typhlodromus pyri (Acari : Phytoseiidae) under different insecticide regimes,Canada,pest pressure,Mite density,1995 - DIPYR v ADV,mites per leaf,European red mite,Panonychus ulmi,Trombidiformes,Tetranychidae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 8,4,4,,32.49621785,6.777609682,,7.140695915,6.656580938,
29,Hardman,2000,Journal of Economic Entomology,Performance of a pyrethroid-resistant strain of the predator mite Typhlodromus pyri (Acari : Phytoseiidae) under different insecticide regimes,Canada,Beneficial insect performance,Mite density,1995 - DIPYR v ADV,mites per leaf,Phytoseiid mite,Typhlodromus pyri,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 8,4,4,,0.072727273,3.709090909,,0.127272727,1.909090909,
29,Hardman,2000,Journal of Economic Entomology,Performance of a pyrethroid-resistant strain of the predator mite Typhlodromus pyri (Acari : Phytoseiidae) under different insecticide regimes,Canada,pest pressure,Mite density,1995 - DIPYR v ADV,mites per leaf,apple rust mite,Aculus schlechtendali,Trombidiformes,Eriophyidae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 8,4,4,,2.061068702,9.618320611,,2.748091603,10.99236641,
29,Hardman,2000,Journal of Economic Entomology,Performance of a pyrethroid-resistant strain of the predator mite Typhlodromus pyri (Acari : Phytoseiidae) under different insecticide regimes,Canada,Beneficial insect performance,Mite density,1995 - DIPYR v ADV,mites per leaf,stigmaeid predator mite,Zetzellia mali,Trombidiformes,Stigmaeidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Fig 8,4,4,,0.014545455,0.061818182,,0.021818182,0.061818182,
30,Babadoost,2004,Horttechnology,Evaluating a wetness-based warning system and reduced-risk fungicides to manage sooty blotch and flyspeck of apple,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,Illinois 2001,%,,sooty blotch,,,,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 5,5,5,,9.72,12.6,,13.41909088,17.5691491,
30,Babadoost,2004,Horttechnology,Evaluating a wetness-based warning system and reduced-risk fungicides to manage sooty blotch and flyspeck of apple,USA,Disease incidence,severity,Illinois 2001,%,,sooty blotch,,,,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 5,5,5,,0.184,0.47,,0.277452699,0.741248946,
30,Babadoost,2004,Horttechnology,Evaluating a wetness-based warning system and reduced-risk fungicides to manage sooty blotch and flyspeck of apple,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,Illinois 2001,%,,flyspeck,,,,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 5,5,5,,8.74,12.6,,15.28424025,18.80678069,
30,Babadoost,2004,Horttechnology,Evaluating a wetness-based warning system and reduced-risk fungicides to manage sooty blotch and flyspeck of apple,USA,Disease incidence,severity,Illinois 2001,%,,flyspeck,,,,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 5,5,5,,0.266,0.572,,0.528043559,1.102619608,
30,Babadoost,2004,Horttechnology,Evaluating a wetness-based warning system and reduced-risk fungicides to manage sooty blotch and flyspeck of apple,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,Illinois 2002,%,,sooty blotch,,,,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 5,5,5,,3.44,5.96,,7.580765133,10.67370601,
30,Babadoost,2004,Horttechnology,Evaluating a wetness-based warning system and reduced-risk fungicides to manage sooty blotch and flyspeck of apple,USA,Disease incidence,severity,Illinois 2002,%,,sooty blotch,,,,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 5,5,5,,0.042,0.108,,0.088430764,0.208973683,
30,Babadoost,2004,Horttechnology,Evaluating a wetness-based warning system and reduced-risk fungicides to manage sooty blotch and flyspeck of apple,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,Illinois 2002,%,,flyspeck,,,,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 5,5,5,,0.6,0.66,,1.341640786,1.126055061,
30,Babadoost,2004,Horttechnology,Evaluating a wetness-based warning system and reduced-risk fungicides to manage sooty blotch and flyspeck of apple,USA,Disease incidence,severity,Illinois 2002,%,,flyspeck,,,,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 5,5,5,,0.006,0.018,,0.013416408,0.026832816,
30,Babadoost,2004,Horttechnology,Evaluating a wetness-based warning system and reduced-risk fungicides to manage sooty blotch and flyspeck of apple,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,Iowa 2002,%,,SBFS,,,,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 6,5,5,,1.1,1.34,,2.19089023,2.940748204,
30,Babadoost,2004,Horttechnology,Evaluating a wetness-based warning system and reduced-risk fungicides to manage sooty blotch and flyspeck of apple,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,Wisconsin 2001,%,,sooty blotch,,,,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 7,4,4,,25.35,54.6,,14.20082157,36.57503702,
30,Babadoost,2004,Horttechnology,Evaluating a wetness-based warning system and reduced-risk fungicides to manage sooty blotch and flyspeck of apple,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,Wisconsin 2001,%,,flyspeck,,,,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 7,4,4,,28.575,54.85,,20.65693992,31.00811722,
30,Babadoost,2004,Horttechnology,Evaluating a wetness-based warning system and reduced-risk fungicides to manage sooty blotch and flyspeck of apple,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,Wisconsin 2002,%,,sooty blotch,,,,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 7,4,4,,14.95,30.5,,15.19857449,33.17127271,
30,Babadoost,2004,Horttechnology,Evaluating a wetness-based warning system and reduced-risk fungicides to manage sooty blotch and flyspeck of apple,USA,Disease incidence,incidence,Wisconsin 2002,%,,flyspeck,,,,none,0,CP,2,2,,,,Table 7,4,4,,23.7,27.1,,31.96393801,35.72282184,
31,Lefebvre,2017,Biological Control,"Spider predation on rosy apple aphid in conventional, organic and insecticide-free orchards and its impact on aphid populations",France,pest pressure,infestation index,April,,,,Araneae,Various,predator,P,1,,,,P,1,0,Table 1,4,,2,0.075,,1.2,0.095742711,,0.989949494
31,Lefebvre,2017,Biological Control,"Spider predation on rosy apple aphid in conventional, organic and insecticide-free orchards and its impact on aphid populations",France,pest pressure,infestation index,May,,,,Araneae,Various,predator,P,1,,,,P,1,0,Table 1,4,,2,0.075,,1.15,0.095742711,,0.070710678
31,Lefebvre,2017,Biological Control,"Spider predation on rosy apple aphid in conventional, organic and insecticide-free orchards and its impact on aphid populations",France,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,Early-season,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,P,1,,,,P,1,0,Fig 2,4,,2,1.7734375,,1.986979167,0.644382611,,0.187825239
31,Lefebvre,2017,Biological Control,"Spider predation on rosy apple aphid in conventional, organic and insecticide-free orchards and its impact on aphid populations",France,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,Mid-season,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,P,1,,,,P,1,0,Fig 2,4,,2,1.03125,,1.703125,0.780694247,,1.134317128
32,Epstein,2001,Biological Control,Ground beetle activity in apple orchards under reduced pesticide management regimes,USA,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,1996,mean per trap,Predatory beetles,Carabidae,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,MP,2,2,,,,Fig 1,6,6,,12.25255973,25.05119454,,8.778034914,14.79725886,
32,Epstein,2001,Biological Control,Ground beetle activity in apple orchards under reduced pesticide management regimes,USA,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,1997,mean per trap,Predatory beetles,Carabidae,Coleoptera,Carabidae,predator,none,0,MP,2,2,,,,Fig 1,6,6,,11.80887372,30.68259386,,11.03524389,16.30206484,
33,Rozman,2013,Erwerbs-Obstbau,Multi Criteria Assessment of Zero Residue Apple Production,Slovenia,Yield,cumulative yield 2008-2010,,kg/ha,,,,,,P,1,,,,MBP,3,2,Table 3,4,4,,46831.25,45653.75,,2713.499017,2807.892018,
33,Rozman,2013,Erwerbs-Obstbau,Multi Criteria Assessment of Zero Residue Apple Production,Slovenia,Disease incidence,AHP calculation weighted by priority,2008,,,,,,,P,1,,,,MBP,3,2,Table 7,4,4,,0.147,0.10325,,0.071591433,0.074486576,
33,Rozman,2013,Erwerbs-Obstbau,Multi Criteria Assessment of Zero Residue Apple Production,Slovenia,Disease incidence,AHP calculation weighted by priority,2009,,,,,,,P,1,,,,MBP,3,2,Table 7,4,4,,0.1305,0.1195,,0.06408588,0.078860637,
33,Rozman,2013,Erwerbs-Obstbau,Multi Criteria Assessment of Zero Residue Apple Production,Slovenia,Disease incidence,AHP calculation weighted by priority,2010,,,,,,,P,1,,,,MBP,3,2,Table 7,4,4,,0.125,0.125,,0,0,
34,Stupp,2021,Crop protection,Mass trapping is a viable alternative to insecticides for management of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in apple orchards in Brazil,Brazil,pest pressure,damage intensity,2017/18 mass trapping,% damaged fruit,,Anastrepha fraterculus,Diptera,Tephritidae,sucker,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Figure 3,2,2,,1.671165644,0.37791411,,0.027763702,0.019087545,
34,Stupp,2021,Crop protection,Mass trapping is a viable alternative to insecticides for management of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in apple orchards in Brazil,Brazil,pest pressure,damage intensity,2018/19 mass trapping,,,Anastrepha fraterculus,Diptera,Tephritidae,sucker,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Figure 3,2,2,,0.441717791,0.409815951,,0.017352314,0.017352314,
34,Stupp,2021,Crop protection,Mass trapping is a viable alternative to insecticides for management of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in apple orchards in Brazil,Brazil,pest pressure,damage intensity,2017/18 toxic baits+trapping,,,Anastrepha fraterculus,Diptera,Tephritidae,sucker,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Figure 4,2,2,,0.801040312,0.603381014,,0.011034176,0.014712235,
34,Stupp,2021,Crop protection,Mass trapping is a viable alternative to insecticides for management of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in apple orchards in Brazil,Brazil,pest pressure,damage intensity,2018/19 toxic baits+trapping,,,Anastrepha fraterculus,Diptera,Tephritidae,sucker,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Figure 4,2,2,,0.452535761,0.650195059,,0.014712235,0.018390293,
35,Warabieda,2015,International Journal of Acarology,"The effect of methyl jasmonate and acibenzolar-S-methyl on the populations of the European red mite (Panonychus ulmi Koch) and Typhlodromus pyri Scheut. in apple orchards, as well as on the yield and growth of apple trees",Poland,pest pressure,feeding pressure,Triton vs JA,cumulative mite-days,spider mite,Panonychus ulmi,Trombidiformes,Tetranychidae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,3,3,,142.1333333,99.43333333,,59.14138427,41.53857645,
35,Warabieda,2015,International Journal of Acarology,"The effect of methyl jasmonate and acibenzolar-S-methyl on the populations of the European red mite (Panonychus ulmi Koch) and Typhlodromus pyri Scheut. in apple orchards, as well as on the yield and growth of apple trees",Poland,pest pressure,feeding pressure,Water vs BTH,cumulative mite-days,spider mite,Panonychus ulmi,Trombidiformes,Tetranychidae,sucker,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,3,3,,280.0666667,214.1666667,,177.7202952,108.4221994,
35,Warabieda,2015,International Journal of Acarology,"The effect of methyl jasmonate and acibenzolar-S-methyl on the populations of the European red mite (Panonychus ulmi Koch) and Typhlodromus pyri Scheut. in apple orchards, as well as on the yield and growth of apple trees",Poland,Beneficial insect performance,feeding pressure,Triton vs JA,cumulative mite-days,predatory mite,Typhlodromus pyri,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,3,3,,8.393333333,9.26,,5.305698195,6.484265571,
35,Warabieda,2015,International Journal of Acarology,"The effect of methyl jasmonate and acibenzolar-S-methyl on the populations of the European red mite (Panonychus ulmi Koch) and Typhlodromus pyri Scheut. in apple orchards, as well as on the yield and growth of apple trees",Poland,Beneficial insect performance,feeding pressure,Water vs BTH,cumulative mite-days,predatory mite,Typhlodromus pyri,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 2,3,3,,9.163333333,7.856666667,,5.341182765,4.170927155,
35,Warabieda,2015,International Journal of Acarology,"The effect of methyl jasmonate and acibenzolar-S-methyl on the populations of the European red mite (Panonychus ulmi Koch) and Typhlodromus pyri Scheut. in apple orchards, as well as on the yield and growth of apple trees",Poland,Yield,yield per tree,Triton vs JA,kg,,,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 4,3,3,,4.473333333,5.31,,2.51257504,2.926209152,
35,Warabieda,2015,International Journal of Acarology,"The effect of methyl jasmonate and acibenzolar-S-methyl on the populations of the European red mite (Panonychus ulmi Koch) and Typhlodromus pyri Scheut. in apple orchards, as well as on the yield and growth of apple trees",Poland,Yield,yield per tree,Water vs BTH,kg,,,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 4,3,3,,5.283333333,5.596666667,,2.806712193,2.969601545,
35,Warabieda,2015,International Journal of Acarology,"The effect of methyl jasmonate and acibenzolar-S-methyl on the populations of the European red mite (Panonychus ulmi Koch) and Typhlodromus pyri Scheut. in apple orchards, as well as on the yield and growth of apple trees",Poland,Yield,fruits per tree,Triton vs JA,#,,,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 4,3,3,,43.33333333,49.6,,27.61020343,30.12175294,
35,Warabieda,2015,International Journal of Acarology,"The effect of methyl jasmonate and acibenzolar-S-methyl on the populations of the European red mite (Panonychus ulmi Koch) and Typhlodromus pyri Scheut. in apple orchards, as well as on the yield and growth of apple trees",Poland,Yield,fruits per tree,Water vs BTH,#,,,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Table 4,3,3,,50,55.73333333,,30.67067003,38.61998619,
36,Marko,2009,Biological Control,"Prey availability, pesticides and the abundance of orchard spider communities",UK,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2001,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 2,12,12,,76,68,,17.88,14.97,
36,Marko,2009,Biological Control,"Prey availability, pesticides and the abundance of orchard spider communities",UK,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2002,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 2,12,12,,41,50,,7.61,8.17,
36,Marko,2009,Biological Control,"Prey availability, pesticides and the abundance of orchard spider communities",UK,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2004,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 2,12,12,,201,211,,54.77,48.37,
36,Marko,2009,Biological Control,"Prey availability, pesticides and the abundance of orchard spider communities",UK,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2006,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 2,12,12,,146,127,,27.01,12.4,
36,Marko,2009,Biological Control,"Prey availability, pesticides and the abundance of orchard spider communities",UK,Beneficial insect performance,richness,2001,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 2,4,4,,1.6,2.4,,0.66,0.84,
36,Marko,2009,Biological Control,"Prey availability, pesticides and the abundance of orchard spider communities",UK,Beneficial insect performance,richness,2002,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 2,4,4,,3.2,3,,0.88,0.73,
36,Marko,2009,Biological Control,"Prey availability, pesticides and the abundance of orchard spider communities",UK,Beneficial insect performance,richness,2004,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 2,4,4,,5.1,4.8,,0.7,0.76,
36,Marko,2009,Biological Control,"Prey availability, pesticides and the abundance of orchard spider communities",UK,Beneficial insect performance,richness,2006,,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 2,4,4,,2.1,3.1,,0.97,0.59,
37,Cross,2008,Agricultuyral Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal,Eliminating Reportable Pesticide Residues from Apples,UK,Disease incidence,incidence,,% fruits infected in July,,apple scab,,,,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 5,6,6,,8.75,3.75,,9.048480535,9.185586535,
37,Cross,2008,Agricultuyral Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal,Eliminating Reportable Pesticide Residues from Apples,UK,Disease incidence,incidence,,% fruits infected at harvest,,apple scab,,,,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 5,6,6,,2.7,1.65,,2.592296279,2.266936258,
37,Cross,2008,Agricultuyral Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal,Eliminating Reportable Pesticide Residues from Apples,UK,Disease incidence,incidence,cv. Cox,% shoots with secondary mildew in Jun-July,,mildew,,,,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 6,6,6,,10.41666667,9.75,,7.486098227,4.446909039,
37,Cross,2008,Agricultuyral Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal,Eliminating Reportable Pesticide Residues from Apples,UK,Disease incidence,incidence,cv. Ahra,% shoots with secondary mildew in Jun-July,,mildew,,,,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 6,6,6,,0.416666667,8.416666667,,1.020620726,3.16885889,
37,Cross,2008,Agricultuyral Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal,Eliminating Reportable Pesticide Residues from Apples,UK,Disease incidence,incidence,,%,,fruit rot,,,,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 7,5,5,,4.7,3.52,,3.295451411,1.813008549,
37,Cross,2008,Agricultuyral Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal,Eliminating Reportable Pesticide Residues from Apples,UK,pest pressure,Insect damage,,% fruits damaged at harvest,rosy apple aphid,,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 8,5,5,,0.36,0.7,,0.415932687,1.212435565,
37,Cross,2008,Agricultuyral Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal,Eliminating Reportable Pesticide Residues from Apples,UK,pest pressure,Insect damage,,% fruits damaged at harvest,various,,,,,none,0,CBP,3,3,,,,Table 8,5,5,,6.04,8,,1.550161282,4.100609711,
38,Roussos,2009,Scientia Horticulturae,Apple tree growth and overall fruit quality under organic and conventional orchard management,Greece,Yield,fruit number per inflorescence at harvest,,,,,,,,none,0,,,,BP,2,2,Table 2,3,,3,1.09,,1.16,,,
38,Roussos,2009,Scientia Horticulturae,Apple tree growth and overall fruit quality under organic and conventional orchard management,Greece,Quality,mean fruit weight,,g,,,,,,none,0,,,,BP,2,2,Table 3,3,,3,185.77,,168.12,,,
38,Roussos,2009,Scientia Horticulturae,Apple tree growth and overall fruit quality under organic and conventional orchard management,Greece,Quality,mean fruit length,,mm,,,,,,none,0,,,,BP,2,2,Table 3,3,,3,64.62,,66.52,,,
38,Roussos,2009,Scientia Horticulturae,Apple tree growth and overall fruit quality under organic and conventional orchard management,Greece,Quality,Soluble solids,,°Brix,,,,,,none,0,,,,BP,2,2,Table 3,3,,3,12.4,,12.66,0.696162465,,0.696162465
38,Roussos,2009,Scientia Horticulturae,Apple tree growth and overall fruit quality under organic and conventional orchard management,Greece,Quality,Colour,L*,,,,,,,none,0,,,,BP,2,2,Table 4,3,,3,40.8,,40.67,,,
39,Srednicka-Tober,2020,Applied Sciences-Basel,Selected Antioxidants in Organic vs. Conventionally Grown Apple Fruits,Poland,Quality,dry matter content,,g/100 g f.w.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Table 1,3,,3,12.88,,14.48,1.07,,1.2
39,Srednicka-Tober,2020,Applied Sciences-Basel,Selected Antioxidants in Organic vs. Conventionally Grown Apple Fruits,Poland,Quality,Vitamin C,,mg/100 g f.w,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Table 1,3,,3,12.73,,12.98,6.59,,3.53
39,Srednicka-Tober,2020,Applied Sciences-Basel,Selected Antioxidants in Organic vs. Conventionally Grown Apple Fruits,Poland,Quality,Phenolic acids,,mg/100 g f.w,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Table 2,3,,3,13.3,,17.5,2.3,,1.6
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,Disease incidence,flower clusters damaged,1999 - GD,%,,Erwinia amylovora,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 1,3,3,,26.83333333,4.6,,16.47128815,4.45421149,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,Disease incidence,flower clusters damaged,1999 - RD,%,,Erwinia amylovora,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 1,3,3,,6.35,0.133333333,,10.01636161,0.115470054,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,Disease incidence,flower clusters damaged,2000 - GD,%,,Erwinia amylovora,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 1,3,3,,1.433333333,0.9,,0.503322296,0.264575131,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,Disease incidence,flower clusters damaged,2000 - RD,%,,Erwinia amylovora,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 1,3,3,,0,0,,0,0,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,Disease incidence,infected terminals,1999,%,,Podosphaera leucotricha,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 2,3,3,,5,6.5,,4.358898944,5.597320788,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,Disease incidence,infected terminals,2000,%,,Podosphaera leucotricha,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 2,3,3,,4.933333333,5.3,,1.882374387,3.534119409,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,Disease incidence,damaged foliage,1999,%,,Podosphaera leucotricha,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 2,3,3,,5.266666667,3.033333333,,6.727803009,2.850146195,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,Disease incidence,damaged foliage,2000,%,,Podosphaera leucotricha,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 2,3,3,,1.6,0.6,,0.721110255,0.173205081,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,Disease incidence,infected fruits,1999,#,,Rosette,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 3,3,3,,9.666666667,4.333333333,,11.54700538,2.309401077,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,Disease incidence,infected fruits,2000,#,,Rosette,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 3,3,3,,6.666666667,4.333333333,,5.507570547,4.041451884,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,Disease incidence,fruit covered by rosette,1999,%,,Rosette,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 3,3,3,,14.63333333,8.866666667,,15.76715996,6.615386106,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,Disease incidence,fruit covered by rosette,2000,%,,Rosette,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 3,3,3,,13.33333333,8,,2.886751346,6.08276253,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,Disease incidence,infected fruits,1999,diseased fruit/ha,,Alternaria alternata,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 4,3,3,,8744,2684,,2960.100674,729.989041,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,Disease incidence,infected fruits,2000,diseased fruit/ha,,Alternaria alternata,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 4,3,3,,13238,6247,,6283.239372,3633.271666,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,Disease incidence,damaged fruit,1999,kg/ha,,Alternaria alternata,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 4,3,3,,1399,444.4,,473.6551066,138.6521908,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,Disease incidence,damaged fruit,2000,kg/ha,,Alternaria alternata,,,,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 4,3,3,,2118.066667,999.4666667,,1005.331236,581.3694637,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,pest pressure,damage intensity,1999 - RD,%,codling moth,Cydia pomonella,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 5,3,3,,0.066666667,0.133333333,,0.115470054,0.115470054,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,pest pressure,damage intensity,2000 - RD,%,codling moth,Cydia pomonella,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 5,2,2,,9.6,4.7,,8.202438662,2.969848481,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,pest pressure,damage intensity,1999 - GD,%,codling moth,Cydia pomonella,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 5,3,3,,0.4,0.266666667,,0.1,0.115470054,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,pest pressure,damage intensity,2000 - GD,%,codling moth,Cydia pomonella,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 5,2,2,,29.8,22,,11.87939392,6.505382387,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,pest pressure,abundance,RD,number of colonies,woolly apple aphid,Eriosoma lanigerum,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 6,4,4,,108.75,128,,169.1062289,152.8485089,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,pest pressure,abundance,GD,number of colonies,woolly apple aphid,Eriosoma lanigerum,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 6,4,4,,107.25,127.25,,138.581805,146.9861105,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,pest pressure,damage intensity,1999 - RD,%,tarnished plant bug,Lygus lineolaris,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 8,3,3,,4.666666667,2.666666667,,2.886751346,2.886751346,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,pest pressure,damage intensity,1999 - GD,%,tarnished plant bug,Lygus lineolaris,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 8,3,3,,1.333333333,1.333333333,,0.577350269,0.577350269,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,pest pressure,damage intensity,2000 - RD,%,tarnished plant bug,Lygus lineolaris,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 8,2,2,,2,2,,0,0,
40,Ramirez-Legarreta,2004,Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia,"Validation of an integrated pest and disease management system in apple [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] orchards in Chihuahua, Mexico",Mexico,pest pressure,damage intensity,2000 - GD,%,tarnished plant bug,Lygus lineolaris,Hemiptera,Miridae,sucker,none,0,CMBP,4,4,,,,Table 8,2,2,,2,3,,0,0,
41,Orpert,2020,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Perceptions and outcomes of conventional vs. organic apple orchard management,USA,pest pressure,Aphid-infested shoots,2014,%,Woolly apple aphid,Eriosoma lanigerum,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 2,7,,10,2.902298851,,2.5,4.263068595,,2.153967309
41,Orpert,2020,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Perceptions and outcomes of conventional vs. organic apple orchard management,USA,pest pressure,Aphid-infested shoots,2015,%,Woolly apple aphid,Eriosoma lanigerum,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 2,7,,10,0.436781609,,0.574712644,0.54028811,,0.683678874
41,Orpert,2020,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Perceptions and outcomes of conventional vs. organic apple orchard management,USA,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2014,# per sticky card per day,Green lacewing,Chrysopa nigricornis,Neuroptera,Chrysopidae,predator,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 2,7,,10,2.597701149,,2.229885057,0.901031571,,0.489156654
41,Orpert,2020,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Perceptions and outcomes of conventional vs. organic apple orchard management,USA,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2015,# per sticky card per day,Green lacewing,Chrysopa nigricornis,Neuroptera,Chrysopidae,predator,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 2,7,,10,1.938697318,,2.398467433,1.100637016,,0.967021607
41,Orpert,2020,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Perceptions and outcomes of conventional vs. organic apple orchard management,USA,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2014,# per sticky card per day,parasitoid,Aphelinus mali,Hymenoptera,Aphelinidae,parasitoid,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 2,7,,10,37.54789272,,67.43295019,21.59234146,,29.67036549
41,Orpert,2020,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Perceptions and outcomes of conventional vs. organic apple orchard management,USA,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2015,# per sticky card per day,parasitoid,Aphelinus mali,Hymenoptera,Aphelinidae,parasitoid,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 2,7,,10,0.123495146,,0.173203883,0.069824788,,0.086750169
41,Orpert,2020,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Perceptions and outcomes of conventional vs. organic apple orchard management,USA,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2014,# per shelter per day,Earwig,European earwig,Dermaptera,Forficulidae,predator,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 2,7,,10,0.321223709,,0.312619503,0.246758711,,0.331961123
41,Orpert,2020,Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,Perceptions and outcomes of conventional vs. organic apple orchard management,USA,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2015,# per shelter per day,Earwig,European earwig,Dermaptera,Forficulidae,predator,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 2,7,,10,0.669856459,,0.631578947,0.427552922,,0.567887022
42,Wearing,2011,Biocontrol Science and Technology,"Diversity of natural enemies in Central Otago, New Zealand apple orchards: a practical measure of sustainability in pest management?",New Zealand,Beneficial insect performance,diversity,beating trays,Shannon-Wiener Index,Natural enemies,various,,,,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Figure 1,5,5,,0.093196406,0.391732991,,0.058756596,0.072663467,
42,Wearing,2011,Biocontrol Science and Technology,"Diversity of natural enemies in Central Otago, New Zealand apple orchards: a practical measure of sustainability in pest management?",New Zealand,Beneficial insect performance,diversity,pitfall traps,Shannon-Wiener Index,Natural enemies,various,,,,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Figure 1,5,5,,0.093196406,0.293530167,,0.058756596,0.071230821,
42,Wearing,2011,Biocontrol Science and Technology,"Diversity of natural enemies in Central Otago, New Zealand apple orchards: a practical measure of sustainability in pest management?",New Zealand,Beneficial insect performance,diversity,beating trays,Shannon-Wiener Index,Natural enemies,various,,,,B,1,MBP,3,2,,,,Figure 2,5,5,,0.278899876,0.573485785,,0.11615319,0.127008517,
42,Wearing,2011,Biocontrol Science and Technology,"Diversity of natural enemies in Central Otago, New Zealand apple orchards: a practical measure of sustainability in pest management?",New Zealand,Beneficial insect performance,diversity,pitfall traps,Shannon-Wiener Index,Natural enemies,various,,,,B,1,MBP,3,2,,,,Figure 2,5,5,,0.278899876,0.438207664,,0.11615319,0.17538064,
43,Ahmad,2013,Crop Protection,Augmentative releases of the predatory mite Kampimodromus aberrans in organic and conventional apple orchards,Italy,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2010,motile forms/leaf,Predatory mite,Kampimodromus aberrans,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 1,4,,4,0.004846939,,0.013010204,0.004740599,,0.012255523
43,Ahmad,2013,Crop Protection,Augmentative releases of the predatory mite Kampimodromus aberrans in organic and conventional apple orchards,Italy,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2010,motile forms/leaf,Predatory mite,Amblyselus andersoni,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 1,4,,4,0.220230474,,0.150576184,0.146489618,,0.073780049
43,Ahmad,2013,Crop Protection,Augmentative releases of the predatory mite Kampimodromus aberrans in organic and conventional apple orchards,Italy,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2011,motile forms/leaf,Predatory mite,Kampimodromus aberrans,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 2,6,,6,0.005208333,,0.021875,0.004166667,,0.017380545
43,Ahmad,2013,Crop Protection,Augmentative releases of the predatory mite Kampimodromus aberrans in organic and conventional apple orchards,Italy,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,2011,motile forms/leaf,Predatory mite,Amblyselus andersoni,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 2,6,,6,0.255919395,,0.188077246,0.221709178,,0.082952372
44,Delate,2008,Hortscience,Organic apple production in two humid regions: Comparing progress in pest management strategies in Iowa and New Zealand,New Zealand,Quality,Fruit weight,cv. Pinkie,g,,,,,,C,1,,,,CP,2,1,Table 2,2,,2,131.85,,138.15,3.464823228,,12.51579003
44,Delate,2008,Hortscience,Organic apple production in two humid regions: Comparing progress in pest management strategies in Iowa and New Zealand,New Zealand,Quality,Firmness,cv. Pinkie,N,,,,,,C,1,,,,CP,2,1,Table 2,2,,2,78.245,,78.36,1.6475588,,3.889087297
44,Delate,2008,Hortscience,Organic apple production in two humid regions: Comparing progress in pest management strategies in Iowa and New Zealand,New Zealand,Quality,Soluble solids,cv. Pinkie,%,,,,,,C,1,,,,CP,2,1,Table 2,2,,2,13.3,,12.95,0.424264069,,0.494974747
44,Delate,2008,Hortscience,Organic apple production in two humid regions: Comparing progress in pest management strategies in Iowa and New Zealand,New Zealand,pest pressure,aphid abundance,,aphid abundance per 200 shoots,Woolly apple aphid,Eriosoma lanigerum,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,C,1,,,,CP,2,1,Figure 2,5,,4,183.5281147,,20.06615215,112.910721,,26.69791524
44,Delate,2008,Hortscience,Organic apple production in two humid regions: Comparing progress in pest management strategies in Iowa and New Zealand,New Zealand,Beneficial insect performance,parasitism,,% parasitism,parasitoids,various,Hymenoptera,Various,parasitoid,C,1,,,,CP,2,1,Figure 2,5,,4,66.60913706,,91.75126904,26.17376234,,11.44025503
44,Delate,2008,Hortscience,Organic apple production in two humid regions: Comparing progress in pest management strategies in Iowa and New Zealand,New Zealand,Beneficial insect performance,,,# per 12 traps,predatory earwigs,various,Dermaptera,Various,predator,C,1,,,,CP,2,1,Figure 3,5,,5,6.240540541,,6.040540541,5.910292368,,8.94427191
44,Delate,2008,Hortscience,Organic apple production in two humid regions: Comparing progress in pest management strategies in Iowa and New Zealand,New Zealand,Beneficial insect performance,,,# per 12 traps,predatory spiders,various,Araneae,Various,predator,C,1,,,,CP,2,1,Figure 3,5,,5,9.624324324,,12.05135135,5.209300835,,7.077820582
45,Peck,2006,Hortscience,"Apple orchard productivity and fruit quality under organic, conventional, and integrated management",USA,Yield,yield,,mg/ha,,,,,,none,0,P,1,1,CMP,3,3,Table 2,2,2,2,40.99,33.545,35.89,7.481189745,4.829539316,29.14694152
45,Peck,2006,Hortscience,"Apple orchard productivity and fruit quality under organic, conventional, and integrated management",USA,Yield,crop density,,kg/cm2 TCSA,,,,,,none,0,P,1,1,CMP,3,3,Table 2,2,2,2,2.01,1.605,2.015,0.593969696,0.049497475,1.718269478
45,Peck,2006,Hortscience,"Apple orchard productivity and fruit quality under organic, conventional, and integrated management",USA,Quality,Fruit weight,,kg,,,,,,none,0,P,1,1,CMP,3,3,Table 2,2,2,2,0.178,0.18,0.167,0.014142136,0.022627417,0.012727922
45,Peck,2006,Hortscience,"Apple orchard productivity and fruit quality under organic, conventional, and integrated management",USA,Quality,Firmness,,N,,,,,,none,0,P,1,1,CMP,3,3,Table 6,2,2,2,75.295,76.655,80.37,3.500178567,6.639732675,2.517300141
45,Peck,2006,Hortscience,"Apple orchard productivity and fruit quality under organic, conventional, and integrated management",USA,Quality,Soluble solids,,Brix,,,,,,none,0,P,1,1,CMP,3,3,Table 6,2,2,2,13.25,13.15,13.15,1.202081528,1.202081528,1.909188309
46,Wearing,2011b,New Zealand Entomologist,"Adult phenology and abundance of Froggatt's apple leafhoppper (Edwardsiana froggatti (Baker)) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) and its egg parasitoids, Anagrus spp. (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), under three pest management programmes in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,pest pressure,leafhopper abundance,Generation 1,mean daily trap catch,Froggatt's apple leafhopper,Edwardsiana froggatti,Hemiptera,Cicadellidae,sucker,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 1,6,6,,2.385,3.811666667,,2.563339619,4.885289824,
46,Wearing,2011b,New Zealand Entomologist,"Adult phenology and abundance of Froggatt's apple leafhoppper (Edwardsiana froggatti (Baker)) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) and its egg parasitoids, Anagrus spp. (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), under three pest management programmes in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,Beneficial insect performance,parasitoid abundance,Generation 1,mean daily trap catch,parasitoid,Anagrus spp.,Hymenoptera,Mymaridae,parasitoid,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 1,6,6,,2.608333333,16.03833333,,3.201308587,26.0179226,
46,Wearing,2011b,New Zealand Entomologist,"Adult phenology and abundance of Froggatt's apple leafhoppper (Edwardsiana froggatti (Baker)) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) and its egg parasitoids, Anagrus spp. (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), under three pest management programmes in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,pest pressure,leafhopper abundance,Generation 2,mean daily trap catch,Froggatt's apple leafhopper,Edwardsiana froggatti,Hemiptera,Cicadellidae,sucker,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 1,6,6,,13.37166667,24.05,,10.64698721,30.0409667,
46,Wearing,2011b,New Zealand Entomologist,"Adult phenology and abundance of Froggatt's apple leafhoppper (Edwardsiana froggatti (Baker)) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) and its egg parasitoids, Anagrus spp. (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), under three pest management programmes in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,Beneficial insect performance,parasitoid abundance,Generation 2,mean daily trap catch,parasitoid,Anagrus spp.,Hymenoptera,Mymaridae,parasitoid,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 1,6,6,,4.231666667,12.805,,5.781599836,11.64750918,
47,Monteiro,2013,Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura,MATING DISRUPTION WITH LOW DENSITY DIFFUSERS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ORIENTAL FRUIT MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) IN APPLE ORCHARDS UNDER SUBTROPICAL CLIMATE IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL,Brazil,pest pressure,damage intensity,2001-02 cv. Gala,,Oriental fruit moth,Grapholita molesta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 2,12,12,,1.46,0.28,,0.76,0.76,
47,Monteiro,2013,Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura,MATING DISRUPTION WITH LOW DENSITY DIFFUSERS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ORIENTAL FRUIT MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) IN APPLE ORCHARDS UNDER SUBTROPICAL CLIMATE IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL,Brazil,pest pressure,damage intensity,2002-03 cv. Gala,,Oriental fruit moth,Grapholita molesta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 2,40,40,,0.02,0.12,,0.03,0.04,
47,Monteiro,2013,Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura,MATING DISRUPTION WITH LOW DENSITY DIFFUSERS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ORIENTAL FRUIT MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) IN APPLE ORCHARDS UNDER SUBTROPICAL CLIMATE IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL,Brazil,pest pressure,damage intensity,2004-05 cv. Gala,,Oriental fruit moth,Grapholita molesta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 2,40,40,,1,0.31,,0.14,0.14,
47,Monteiro,2013,Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura,MATING DISRUPTION WITH LOW DENSITY DIFFUSERS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ORIENTAL FRUIT MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) IN APPLE ORCHARDS UNDER SUBTROPICAL CLIMATE IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL,Brazil,pest pressure,damage intensity,2005-06 cv. Gala,,Oriental fruit moth,Grapholita molesta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 2,20,20,,0.42,0.07,,0.06,0.03,
47,Monteiro,2013,Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura,MATING DISRUPTION WITH LOW DENSITY DIFFUSERS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ORIENTAL FRUIT MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) IN APPLE ORCHARDS UNDER SUBTROPICAL CLIMATE IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL,Brazil,pest pressure,damage intensity,2006-07 cv. Gala,,Oriental fruit moth,Grapholita molesta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 2,20,20,,0.48,0.61,,0.21,0.19,
47,Monteiro,2013,Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura,MATING DISRUPTION WITH LOW DENSITY DIFFUSERS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ORIENTAL FRUIT MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) IN APPLE ORCHARDS UNDER SUBTROPICAL CLIMATE IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL,Brazil,pest pressure,damage intensity,2001-02 cv. Fuji,,Oriental fruit moth,Grapholita molesta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 2,12,12,,4.31,0.42,,1.21,0.17,
47,Monteiro,2013,Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura,MATING DISRUPTION WITH LOW DENSITY DIFFUSERS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ORIENTAL FRUIT MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) IN APPLE ORCHARDS UNDER SUBTROPICAL CLIMATE IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL,Brazil,pest pressure,damage intensity,2002-03 cv. Fuji,,Oriental fruit moth,Grapholita molesta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 2,32,32,,1.53,0.39,,0.34,0.09,
47,Monteiro,2013,Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura,MATING DISRUPTION WITH LOW DENSITY DIFFUSERS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ORIENTAL FRUIT MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) IN APPLE ORCHARDS UNDER SUBTROPICAL CLIMATE IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL,Brazil,pest pressure,damage intensity,2004-05 cv. Fuji,,Oriental fruit moth,Grapholita molesta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 2,18,18,,48.24,26.89,,5.17,3.17,
47,Monteiro,2013,Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura,MATING DISRUPTION WITH LOW DENSITY DIFFUSERS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ORIENTAL FRUIT MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) IN APPLE ORCHARDS UNDER SUBTROPICAL CLIMATE IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL,Brazil,pest pressure,damage intensity,2006-07 cv. Fuji,,Oriental fruit moth,Grapholita molesta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 2,20,20,,1.99,2.19,,0.52,0.17,
48,Porcel,2018,Journal of Applied Ecology,Organic management in apple orchards: Higher impacts on biological control than on pollination,Sweden,pest pressure,aphids per colony,,,rosy apple aphid,Dysaphis plantaginea,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 1,6,,6,121.0072896,,23.19416832,110.0496056,,6.295211179
48,Porcel,2018,Journal of Applied Ecology,Organic management in apple orchards: Higher impacts on biological control than on pollination,Sweden,Beneficial insect performance,Anthocoridae abundance,,# per sample,Natural enemies,Anthocoridae,Hemiptera,Anthocoridae,predator,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 4a,7,,7,0.208987441,,0.591346154,0.138064094,,0.305533846
48,Porcel,2018,Journal of Applied Ecology,Organic management in apple orchards: Higher impacts on biological control than on pollination,Sweden,Beneficial insect performance,Miridae abundance,,,Natural enemies,Miridae,Hemiptera,Miridae,predator,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 4b,7,,7,0.029267575,,0.546671242,0.044744763,,0.443051041
48,Porcel,2018,Journal of Applied Ecology,Organic management in apple orchards: Higher impacts on biological control than on pollination,Sweden,Beneficial insect performance,Forficulidae abundance,,,Natural enemies,Forficulidae,Dermaptera,Forficulidae,predator,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 4c,7,,7,0.31714876,,0.332201889,0.213517506,,0.105173977
48,Porcel,2018,Journal of Applied Ecology,Organic management in apple orchards: Higher impacts on biological control than on pollination,Sweden,Beneficial insect performance,Coccinellidae,,,Natural enemies,Coccinelidae,Coleoptera,Coccinelidae,predator,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 4d,7,,7,0.029663518,,0.085153483,0.035213558,,0.052278774
48,Porcel,2018,Journal of Applied Ecology,Organic management in apple orchards: Higher impacts on biological control than on pollination,Sweden,Beneficial insect performance,Neuroptera larvae abundance,,,Natural enemies,Neuroptera larvae,Neuroptera,,predator,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 4e,7,,7,0.028257457,,0.042386185,0.016514149,,0.026622951
48,Porcel,2018,Journal of Applied Ecology,Organic management in apple orchards: Higher impacts on biological control than on pollination,Sweden,Beneficial insect performance,Cantharidae abundance,,,Natural enemies,Cantharidae,Coleoptera,Cantharidae,predator,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 4f,7,,7,0.019427002,,0.030023548,0.002879003,,0.013131815
48,Porcel,2018,Journal of Applied Ecology,Organic management in apple orchards: Higher impacts on biological control than on pollination,Sweden,Beneficial insect performance,,,,Pollinators,various,,,nectar-feeder,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 5c,10,,10,0.044059041,,0.037037428,0.026805179,,0.020203904
49,Chen,2021,Hortscience,Management of Pest Insects and Plant Diseases in Fruit and Nursery Production with Laser-guided Variable-rate Sprayers,USA,pest pressure,moth abundance,2017,number of codling moths,Codling moth,,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Figure 2,11,11,,10.51931529,12.71686329,,10.43036937,12.38918777,
49,Chen,2021,Hortscience,Management of Pest Insects and Plant Diseases in Fruit and Nursery Production with Laser-guided Variable-rate Sprayers,USA,pest pressure,moth abundance,2018,number of codling moths,Codling moth,,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Figure 2,6,6,,6.785411366,6.95504665,,9.149579056,9.222880232,
49,Chen,2021,Hortscience,Management of Pest Insects and Plant Diseases in Fruit and Nursery Production with Laser-guided Variable-rate Sprayers,USA,pest pressure,moth abundance,2019,number of codling moths,Codling moth,,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Figure 2,14,14,,0.881497637,0.535259905,,0.812449514,0.58724805,
49,Chen,2021,Hortscience,Management of Pest Insects and Plant Diseases in Fruit and Nursery Production with Laser-guided Variable-rate Sprayers,USA,Disease incidence,disease severity,Apple scab,%,,Apple scab,,,,none,0,P,1,1,,,,Figure 3,3,3,,8.917705736,1.496259352,,1.904838647,0.37585606,
50,Wearing,2010,NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE,"Biological control of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), during transition to integrated fruit production for pipfruit in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,pest pressure,WAA infestation,1995-96,% fruit infested,woolly apple aphid,,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 3,10,10,,0.03,0.9,,0.09486833,1.549516053,
50,Wearing,2010,NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE,"Biological control of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), during transition to integrated fruit production for pipfruit in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,pest pressure,WAA infestation,1995-96,% fruit infested,woolly apple aphid,,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 3,10,10,,0.03,0.05,,0.09486833,0.158113883,
50,Wearing,2010,NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE,"Biological control of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), during transition to integrated fruit production for pipfruit in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,pest pressure,WAA infestation,1995-96,% fruit infested,woolly apple aphid,,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,B,1,MBP,3,2,,,,Table 3,10,10,,0.03,0.002,,0.09486833,0.006324555,
50,Wearing,2010,NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE,"Biological control of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), during transition to integrated fruit production for pipfruit in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,pest pressure,WAA infestation,1996-97,% fruit infested,woolly apple aphid,,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 3,10,10,,0,0.07,,0,0.126491106,
50,Wearing,2010,NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE,"Biological control of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), during transition to integrated fruit production for pipfruit in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,pest pressure,WAA infestation,1996-97,% fruit infested,woolly apple aphid,,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 3,10,10,,0,0,,0,0,
50,Wearing,2010,NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE,"Biological control of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), during transition to integrated fruit production for pipfruit in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,pest pressure,WAA infestation,1996-97,% fruit infested,woolly apple aphid,,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,B,1,MBP,3,2,,,,Table 3,10,10,,0,0.008,,0,0.025298221,
50,Wearing,2010,NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE,"Biological control of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), during transition to integrated fruit production for pipfruit in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,pest pressure,WAA infestation,1997-98,% fruit infested,woolly apple aphid,,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 3,10,10,,0,0.5,,0,0.442718872,
50,Wearing,2010,NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE,"Biological control of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), during transition to integrated fruit production for pipfruit in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,pest pressure,WAA infestation,1997-98,% fruit infested,woolly apple aphid,,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 3,10,10,,0,2.83,,0,3.857978745,
50,Wearing,2010,NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE,"Biological control of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), during transition to integrated fruit production for pipfruit in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,pest pressure,WAA infestation,1997-98,% fruit infested,woolly apple aphid,,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,B,1,MBP,3,2,,,,Table 3,10,10,,0,0,,0,0,
50,Wearing,2010,NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE,"Biological control of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), during transition to integrated fruit production for pipfruit in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,pest pressure,WAA infestation,1998-99,% fruit infested,woolly apple aphid,,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 3,10,10,,0,0.5,,0,0.379473319,
50,Wearing,2010,NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE,"Biological control of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), during transition to integrated fruit production for pipfruit in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,pest pressure,WAA infestation,1998-99,% fruit infested,woolly apple aphid,,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 3,10,10,,0,0.35,,0,0.411096096,
50,Wearing,2010,NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE,"Biological control of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), during transition to integrated fruit production for pipfruit in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,pest pressure,WAA infestation,1998-99,% fruit infested,woolly apple aphid,,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,B,1,MBP,3,2,,,,Table 3,10,10,,0,0,,0,0,
50,Wearing,2010,NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE,"Biological control of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), during transition to integrated fruit production for pipfruit in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,pest pressure,WAA infestation,1999-2000,% fruit infested,woolly apple aphid,,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 3,10,10,,0,0.34,,0,0.284604989,
50,Wearing,2010,NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE,"Biological control of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), during transition to integrated fruit production for pipfruit in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,pest pressure,WAA infestation,1999-2000,% fruit infested,woolly apple aphid,,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,B,1,BP,2,1,,,,Table 3,10,10,,0,0.1,,0,0.126491106,
50,Wearing,2010,NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE,"Biological control of woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), during transition to integrated fruit production for pipfruit in Central Otago, New Zealand",New Zealand,pest pressure,WAA infestation,1999-2000,% fruit infested,woolly apple aphid,,Hemiptera,Aphididae,sucker,B,1,MBP,3,2,,,,Table 3,10,10,,0,0,,0,0,
51,Trimble,2004,Journal of Economic Entomology,Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera : tortricidae),Canada,pest pressure,abundance,2000 spray,#,obliquebanded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 2,3,3,,120.7,24.3,,77.5,18.9,
51,Trimble,2004,Journal of Economic Entomology,Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera : tortricidae),Canada,pest pressure,abundance,2000 isomate,#,obliquebanded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 2,3,3,,120.7,19.3,,77.5,16.5,
51,Trimble,2004,Journal of Economic Entomology,Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera : tortricidae),Canada,pest pressure,abundance,2001 spray,#,obliquebanded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 2,3,3,,211.3,70.7,,49.3,57.8,
51,Trimble,2004,Journal of Economic Entomology,Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera : tortricidae),Canada,pest pressure,abundance,2001 isomate,#,obliquebanded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 2,3,3,,211.3,8,,49.3,5.6,
51,Trimble,2004,Journal of Economic Entomology,Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera : tortricidae),Canada,pest pressure,abundance,2002 spray,#,obliquebanded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 2,3,3,,163,81,,76,53.7,
51,Trimble,2004,Journal of Economic Entomology,Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera : tortricidae),Canada,pest pressure,abundance,2002 isomate,#,obliquebanded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 2,3,3,,163,3,,76,2.6,
51,Trimble,2004,Journal of Economic Entomology,Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera : tortricidae),Canada,pest pressure,damage intensity,2000 spray,% spring larval damage,obliquebanded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 3,3,3,,0.016,0.013,,0.018,0.018,
51,Trimble,2004,Journal of Economic Entomology,Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera : tortricidae),Canada,pest pressure,damage intensity,2000 isomate,% spring larval damage,obliquebanded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 3,3,3,,0.016,0.02,,0.018,0.029,
51,Trimble,2004,Journal of Economic Entomology,Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera : tortricidae),Canada,pest pressure,damage intensity,2000 spray,% summer larval damage,obliquebanded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 3,3,3,,0.039,0.008,,0.052,0.007,
51,Trimble,2004,Journal of Economic Entomology,Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera : tortricidae),Canada,pest pressure,damage intensity,2000 isomate,% summer larval damage,obliquebanded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 3,3,3,,0.039,0.014,,0.052,0.017,
51,Trimble,2004,Journal of Economic Entomology,Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera : tortricidae),Canada,pest pressure,damage intensity,2001 spray,% spring larval damage,obliquebanded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 3,3,3,,0.009,0.005,,0.006,0.004,
51,Trimble,2004,Journal of Economic Entomology,Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera : tortricidae),Canada,pest pressure,damage intensity,2001 isomate,% spring larval damage,obliquebanded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 3,3,3,,0.009,0.015,,0.006,0.016,
51,Trimble,2004,Journal of Economic Entomology,Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera : tortricidae),Canada,pest pressure,damage intensity,2001 spray,% summer larval damage,obliquebanded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 3,3,3,,0.019,0.009,,0.025,0.005,
51,Trimble,2004,Journal of Economic Entomology,Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera : tortricidae),Canada,pest pressure,damage intensity,2001 isomate,% summer larval damage,obliquebanded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 3,3,3,,0.019,0.016,,0.025,0.011,
51,Trimble,2004,Journal of Economic Entomology,Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera : tortricidae),Canada,pest pressure,damage intensity,2002 spray,% spring larval damage,obliquebanded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 3,3,3,,0.004,0.003,,0.004,0.001,
51,Trimble,2004,Journal of Economic Entomology,Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera : tortricidae),Canada,pest pressure,damage intensity,2002 isomate,% spring larval damage,obliquebanded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 3,3,3,,0.004,0.004,,0.004,0.003,
51,Trimble,2004,Journal of Economic Entomology,Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera : tortricidae),Canada,pest pressure,damage intensity,2002 spray,% summer larval damage,obliquebanded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 3,3,3,,0.021,0.007,,0.017,0.004,
51,Trimble,2004,Journal of Economic Entomology,Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera : tortricidae),Canada,pest pressure,damage intensity,2002 isomate,% summer larval damage,obliquebanded leafroller,Choristoneura rosaceana,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,chewer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 3,3,3,,0.021,0.003,,0.017,0.001,
52,Mazzia,2015,Ecotoxicology,The impact of management strategies in apple orchards on the structural and functional diversity of epigeal spiders,France,Beneficial insect performance,species richness,,index,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,P,1,1,Table 2,3,3,,0.9,1.05,1.26,1.18,1.37625,1.278125
52,Mazzia,2015,Ecotoxicology,The impact of management strategies in apple orchards on the structural and functional diversity of epigeal spiders,France,Beneficial insect performance,Shannon diversity,,index,Araneae,,Araneae,Various,predator,none,0,P,1,1,P,1,1,Table 2,3,3,,0.16,0.13,0.34,0.307905827,0.107429594,0.20766771
53,Schmidt-Jeffris,2015,Experimental and Applied Acarology,Phytoseiids in Washington commercial apple orchards: biodiversity and factors affecting abundance,USA,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,Con-1,#,Predatory mite,Galendromus occidentalis,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 4B,8,,15,37.53731343,,3.208955224,37.14949059,,10.11600128
53,Schmidt-Jeffris,2015,Experimental and Applied Acarology,Phytoseiids in Washington commercial apple orchards: biodiversity and factors affecting abundance,USA,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,Con-2,#,Predatory mite,Galendromus occidentalis,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 4B,13,,15,21.94029851,,3.208955224,17.22054341,,10.11600128
53,Schmidt-Jeffris,2015,Experimental and Applied Acarology,Phytoseiids in Washington commercial apple orchards: biodiversity and factors affecting abundance,USA,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,Con-3,#,Predatory mite,Galendromus occidentalis,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 4B,26,,15,30.37313433,,3.208955224,43.37971825,,10.11600128
53,Schmidt-Jeffris,2015,Experimental and Applied Acarology,Phytoseiids in Washington commercial apple orchards: biodiversity and factors affecting abundance,USA,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,Con-4,#,Predatory mite,Galendromus occidentalis,Mesostigmata,Phytoseiidae,predator,none,0,,,,P,1,1,Figure 4B,14,,15,20.07462687,,3.208955224,27.08513183,,10.11600128
54,Erler,2023,Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection,"Mass?trapping the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), using newly designed light trap reduces fruit damage in apple orchards",Turkey,pest pressure,damage intensity,damaged fruits,%,,Codling moth,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 4,5,5,,6.2,4.5,,1.565247584,1.341640786,
54,Erler,2023,Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection,"Mass?trapping the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), using newly designed light trap reduces fruit damage in apple orchards",Turkey,pest pressure,damage intensity,damaged fruits,%,,Codling moth,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 4,5,5,,6.4,4.1,,1.565247584,1.341640786,
54,Erler,2023,Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection,"Mass?trapping the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), using newly designed light trap reduces fruit damage in apple orchards",Turkey,pest pressure,damage intensity,damaged fruits,%,,Codling moth,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 4,9,9,,7.2,4.6,,1.5,1.8,
54,Erler,2023,Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection,"Mass?trapping the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), using newly designed light trap reduces fruit damage in apple orchards",Turkey,pest pressure,damage intensity,damaged fruits,%,,Codling moth,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Miner/borer,none,0,M,1,1,,,,Table 4,9,9,,7.1,4.7,,2.1,2.1,
55,Hulsmans,2023,"Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment","Cascading effects of management and landscape on insect pollinators, pollination services and yield in apple orchards",Belgium,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,wild pollinator abundance,#,Pollinators,various,Hymenoptera,,nectar-feeder,none,1,P,,,MP,2,2,Figure 3A,12,,12,2.775374376,,5.271214642,1.10666807,,2.075002631
55,Hulsmans,2023,"Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment","Cascading effects of management and landscape on insect pollinators, pollination services and yield in apple orchards",Belgium,Beneficial insect performance,abundance,wild pollinator abundance,#,Pollinators,various,Hymenoptera,,nectar-feeder,none,1,P,,,MP,2,2,Figure 3A,12,,12,4.572379368,,10.06322795,1.936669123,,4.495839035
55,Hulsmans,2023,"Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment","Cascading effects of management and landscape on insect pollinators, pollination services and yield in apple orchards",Belgium,Beneficial insect performance,diversity,wild pollinator diversity,#,Pollinators,various,Hymenoptera,,nectar-feeder,none,1,P,,,MP,2,2,Figure 3B,12,,12,2.135779817,,2.583486239,0.686464173,,0.711888772
55,Hulsmans,2023,"Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment","Cascading effects of management and landscape on insect pollinators, pollination services and yield in apple orchards",Belgium,Beneficial insect performance,diversity,wild pollinator diversity,#,Pollinators,various,Hymenoptera,,nectar-feeder,none,1,P,,,MP,2,2,Figure 3B,12,,12,2.686238532,,3.669724771,0.711888772,,1.220380752
55,Hulsmans,2023,"Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment","Cascading effects of management and landscape on insect pollinators, pollination services and yield in apple orchards",Belgium,Yield,yield,,no. apples/tree/apple weight,,,,,,none,1,P,,,MP,2,2,Figure 5,12,,12,121.0365854,,94.00406504,27.81138492,,28.86751346
55,Hulsmans,2023,"Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment","Cascading effects of management and landscape on insect pollinators, pollination services and yield in apple orchards",Belgium,Yield,yield,,no. apples/tree/apple weight,,,,,,none,1,P,,,MP,2,2,Figure 5,12,,12,134.4512195,,113.8211382,32.03589908,,31.33181339